Comparative planning study for proton radiotherapy of benign brain tumors

被引:19
作者
Cozzi, Luca [1 ]
Clivio, Alessandro
Vanetti, Eugenio
Nicolini, Giorgia
Fogliata, Antonella
机构
[1] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Phys Unit, CH-6504 Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Med Phys Specializat Sch, Milan, Italy
关键词
proton therapy; comparative planning; brain tumors;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-006-1500-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A comparative study of different systems for proton-based radiotherapy was conducted. Material and Methods: The Paul Scherrer Institute method for spot scanning was compared with the systems for passive scattering from the Helax-TMS and the Varian Eclipse. Twelve cases of "benign" brain tumors were considered (meningiomas, neurinomas, and hypophyseal adenomas). Organs at risk included chiasm, brainstem, eyes and optic nerves as well as the not otherwise specified healthy brain tissue in view of long-term toxicity. Results: The results showed that high target coverage was achievable (V-90 > 98% for all systems). Plans designed with the spot-scanning technique presented the minimum involvement of healthy tissue (e.g., the lowest maximum significant dose to healthy brain [25.6 Gy] or the lowest conformity index [CI95 = 1.3], between 38% and 46% lower than for the other techniques). Conclusion: In this study, no definitive indication of superiority of any technique can be drawn but spot scanning can better conform dose distributions and minimize the irradiation of healthy volumes at medium to Low dose Levels, a factor of interest when tong Life expectancy is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 381
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, 50 ICRU
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
  • [3] A comparison of dose distributions of proton and photon beams in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain lesions
    Baumert, BG
    Lomax, AJ
    Miltchev, V
    Davis, JB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05): : 1439 - 1449
  • [4] BERENS M, 1991, NEUROSURG CLIN N AM, V1, P1
  • [5] Radiotherapy of small intracranial tumours with different advanced techniques using photon and proton beams: a treatment planning study
    Bolsi, A
    Fogliata, A
    Cozzi, L
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [6] CANCER STATISTICS, 1994
    BORING, CC
    SQUIRES, TS
    TONG, T
    MONTGOMERY, S
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1994, 44 (01) : 7 - 26
  • [7] A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation
    Cardinale, RM
    Benedict, SH
    Wu, QW
    Zwicker, RD
    Gaballa, HE
    Mohan, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02): : 431 - 436
  • [8] Combs SE, 2004, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V180, P590, DOI 10.1007/s00066-004-1299-x
  • [9] TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION
    EMAMI, B
    LYMAN, J
    BROWN, A
    COIA, L
    GOITEIN, M
    MUNZENRIDER, JE
    SHANK, B
    SOLIN, LJ
    WESSON, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01): : 109 - 122
  • [10] MULTIPLE SCATTERING WITH ENERGY LOSS
    EYGES, L
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1948, 74 (10): : 1534 - 1535