Techniques used by United Kingdom consultant plastic surgeons to select implant size for primary breast augmentation

被引:9
作者
Holmes, W. J. M. [1 ]
Timmons, M. J. [1 ]
Kauser, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bradford Royal Infirm, Dept Plast Surg, Bradford BD9 6RJ, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Fac Med & Hlth, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Breast augmentation; Breast sizers; Breast measurements; Tebbetts; Pre-operative sizing; INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE; DEVICE REGISTRIES; MAMMAPLASTY; VOLUME; SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.06.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Techniques used to estimate implant size for primary breast augmentation have evolved since the 1970s. Currently no consensus exists on the optimal method to select implant size for primary breast augmentation. Methods: In 2013 we asked United Kingdom consultant plastic surgeons who were full members of BAPRAS or BAAPS what was their technique for implant size selection for primary aesthetic breast augmentation. We also asked what was the range of implant sizes they commonly used. The answers to question one were grouped into four categories: experience, measurements, pre-operative external sizers and intra-operative sizers. Results: The response rate was 46% (164/358). Overall, 95% (153/159) of all respondents performed some form of pre-operative assessment, the others relied on "experience" only. The most common technique for pre-operative assessment was by external sizers (74%). Measurements were used by 57% of respondents and 3% used intra-operative sizers only. A combination of measurements and sizers was used by 34% of respondents. The most common measurements were breast base (68%), breast tissue compliance (19%), breast height (15%), and chest diameter (9%). The median implant size commonly used in primary breast augmentation was 300cc. Summary: Pre-operative external sizers are the most common technique used by UK consultant plastic surgeons to select implant size for primary breast augmentation. We discuss the above findings in relation to the evolution of pre-operative planning techniques for breast augmentation. (C) 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1364 / 1369
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The Process of Breast Augmentation: Four Sequential Steps for Optimizing Outcomes for Patients [J].
Adams, William P., Jr. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) :1892-1900
[2]   Breast augmentation: Part III-epreoperative considerations and planning [J].
Berry, M. G. ;
Cucchiara, V. ;
Davies, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (11) :1401-1409
[3]  
Blondeel PN, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, P455, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181954cc1
[4]  
British Association of Aaesthetic Plastic Surgeons, BRIT SUCKS
[5]   BREAST IMPLANT SIZE SELECTION AND PATIENT SATISFACTION [J].
BRODY, GS .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 68 (04) :611-613
[6]   The perfect breast: Is it attainable? - Does it exist? [J].
Brody, GS .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (05) :1500-1503
[7]   Patient Expectations After Breast Augmentation: The Imperative to Audit Your Sizing System [J].
Brown, Tim .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) :1134-1139
[8]   Preoperative Sizing for Breast Augmentation [J].
Casas, Laurie A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (02) :1006-1007
[9]   Preoperative Assessment Preferences and Reported Reoperation Rates for Size Change in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Survey of ASPS Members [J].
Choudry, Umar ;
Kim, Nicholas .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (06) :1352-1359
[10]   International Importance of Robust Breast Device Registries [J].
Cooter, Rodney D. ;
Barker, Shane ;
Carroll, Sean M. ;
Evans, Gregory R. D. ;
von Fritschen, Uwe ;
Hoflehner, Helmut ;
Le Louarn, Claude ;
Lumenta, David B. ;
Mathijssen, Irene M. J. ;
McNeil, John ;
Mulgrew, Stephen ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Perks, Graeme ;
Rakhorst, Hinne ;
Randquist, Charles ;
Topaz, Moris ;
Verheyden, Charles ;
de Waal, John .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (02) :330-336