Executive neurocognition, memory systems, and borderline personality disorder

被引:95
作者
Fertuck, Eric A. [1 ]
Lenzenweger, Mark F.
Clarkin, John F.
Hoermann, Simone
Stanley, Barbara
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York State Psychiat Inst, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] CUNY John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, New York, NY 10019 USA
[3] SUNY Binghamton, Binghamton, NY USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
borderline personality; memory systems; memory; cognition; executive function; neurocognition; neuropsychology; neuroscience;
D O I
10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.008
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a common, disabling, and burdensome psychiatric condition. It is characterized by turbulent fluctuations of negative emotions and moods, unstable and conflictual interpersonal relationships, an incoherent and often contradictory sense of self, and impulsive, potentially lethal self-injurious behaviors. The neurobehavioral facets of BPD have not been extensively studied. However, clinical theoreticians and researchers have proposed that the symptoms and behaviors of BPD are, in part, associated with disruptions in basic neurocognitive processes. This review summarizes and evaluates research that has investigated the relationship between executive neurocognition, memory systems, and BPD. Three historical phases of research are delineated and reviewed, and the methodological and conceptual challenges this body of investigation highlights are discussed. Laboratory-based assessment of executive neurocognition and memory systems is integral to an interdisciplinary approach to research in BPD. Such an approach holds promise in elucidating the neurobehavioral facets, development, diagnostic boundaries, prevention, and optimal interventions for this debilitating and enigmatic disorder. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 375
页数:30
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]   Attachment studies with borderline patients: A review [J].
Agrawal, HR ;
Gunderson, J ;
Holmes, BM ;
Lyons-Ruth, K .
HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 12 (02) :94-104
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, P5
[3]   BORDERLINE PERSONALITY SUB-CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRULONIS, PA ;
GLUECK, BC ;
STROEBEL, CF ;
VOGEL, NG .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1982, 170 (11) :670-679
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, BORDERLINE CONDITION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Diagnostic Psychological Testing
[6]   No evidence for overgeneral memories in borderline personality disorder [J].
Arntz, A ;
Meeren, M ;
Wessel, I .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2002, 40 (09) :1063-1068
[7]   Hypervigilance in borderline disorder: A test with the emotional Stroop paradigm [J].
Arntz, A ;
Appels, C ;
Sieswerda, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (04) :366-373
[8]   Recent developments in working memory [J].
Baddeley, A .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (02) :234-238
[9]   Neurocognitive deficits in decision-making and planning of patients with DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder [J].
Bazanis, E ;
Rogers, RD ;
Dowson, JH ;
Taylor, P ;
Meux, C ;
Staley, C ;
Nevinson-Andrews, D ;
Taylor, C ;
Robbins, TW ;
Sahakian, BJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (08) :1395-1405
[10]   Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders [J].
Bender, DS ;
Dolan, RT ;
Skodol, AE ;
Sanislow, CA ;
Dyck, IR ;
McGlashan, TH ;
Shea, MT ;
Zanarini, MC ;
Oldham, JM ;
Gunderson, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 158 (02) :295-302