A methodology for overall consequence assessment in oil and gas pipeline industry

被引:68
作者
Chen, Xuefeng [1 ]
Wu, Zongzhi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Wentao [3 ]
Kang, Rongxue [4 ]
Wang, Shu [1 ]
Sang, Haiquan [4 ]
Miao, Yongchun [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Civil & Resource Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Hlth Commiss Peoples Republ China, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Res Ctr Urban Syst Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] China Acad Safety Sci & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
quantitative risk assessment (QRA); oil and gas pipeline; consequence assessment; quantitative result; loss value; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; NATURAL-GAS; BOW-TIE; SAFETY; ACCIDENTS; FAILURE; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12050
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) has been widely used in the oil and gas pipeline industry. QRA mainly includes four steps, namely, hazard identification, probability calculation, consequence assessment, and risk quantification. Consequence assessment is an integral part of QRA, which aims to quantify the negative impacts when pipeline failure events take place. However, the current consequence assessment methods mainly pay attention to the determination of the influence area around accidents and to simple assimilations of the losses, ignoring the components of these losses. This leads to the deterioration of the quality of the QRA. In this article, a methodology for overall consequence assessment in the oil and gas pipeline industry is proposed. The methodology mainly involves three stages, namely, identification of the accident scenario, the determination of influence area, and the calculation of possible losses. The most important innovation spot is integrating four aspects of release accident loss into a quantitative model, to calculate a quantitative result of the loss value of a release accident. Therefore, this study can overcome the limitations of current QRA methodologies and improve the quality of QRA for oil and gas pipelines. (c) 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 38: e12050, 2019
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A methodology for overall consequence modeling in chemical industry [J].
Arunraj, N. S. ;
Maiti, J. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 169 (1-3) :556-574
[2]   Hazard analysis of failure of natural gas and petroleum gas pipelines [J].
Bariha, Nilambar ;
Mishra, Indra Mani ;
Srivastava, Vimal Chandra .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 :217-226
[3]   Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines [J].
Brito, A. J. ;
de Almeida, A. T. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (02) :187-198
[4]   Fire spread simulation using GIS: Aiming at urban natural gas pipeline [J].
Cheng, Liang ;
Li, Shuang ;
Ma, Lei ;
Li, Manchun ;
Ma, Xiaoxue .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 75 :23-35
[5]   Consequences assessment of explosions in pipes using coupled FEM-SPH method [J].
Du, Yang ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Zhang, Anda ;
Ma, Li ;
Zheng, Jinyang .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 43 :549-558
[6]   Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines [J].
Dziubinski, M. ;
Fratczak, M. ;
Markowski, A. S. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2006, 19 (05) :399-408
[7]   The costs of industrial accidents for the organization: Developing methods and tools for evaluation and cost-benefit analysis of investment in safety [J].
Gavious, Arieh ;
Mizrahi, Shlomo ;
Shani, Yael ;
Minchuk, Yizhaq .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (04) :434-438
[8]   Assessing the consequences of pipeline accidents to support land-use planning [J].
Giovanni Ramirez-Camacho, J. ;
Carbone, Federica ;
Pastor, Elsa ;
Bubbico, Roberto ;
Casal, Joaquim .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 97 :34-42
[9]   A novel method of risk assessment based on cloud inference for natural gas pipelines [J].
Guo, Yanbao ;
Meng, Xiaoli ;
Meng, Tao ;
Wang, Deguo ;
Liu, Shuhai .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 30 :421-429
[10]   Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network [J].
Han, Z. Y. ;
Weng, W. G. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 189 (1-2) :509-518