Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?

被引:45
作者
Aadland, David [1 ]
Caplan, Arthur J.
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pam.20211
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we address the often contentious debate over state and local recycling policy by carefully estimating the social net benefit of curbside recycling. Benefits are estimated using household survey data from over 4,000 households across 40 western U.S. cities. We calibrate household willingness-to-pay for hypothetical bias using an innovative experimental design that contrasts stated and revealed preferences. Cost estimates are compiled from previous studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Local Self Reliance, and from in-depth interviews with recycling coordinators in our sampled cities. Across our sample of cities, we find that the estimated mean social net benefit of curbside recycling is almost exactly zero. On a city-by-city basis, however, our social net-benefit analysis often makes clear predictions about whether a curbside recycling program is an efficient use of resources. Surprisingly, several curbside recycling programs in our sample appear to be inefficient. (c) 2006 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 874
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions: Comment [J].
Aadland, D ;
Caplan, AJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2004, 80 (02) :312-315
[2]   Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias [J].
Aadland, D ;
Caplan, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (02) :492-502
[3]  
AADLAND D, IN PRESS J EC BEHAV
[4]  
Aadland DM, 1999, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V42, P781, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640569910821
[5]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[6]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, US CENSUS BUREAU
[8]  
[Anonymous], J ENV PLANNING MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640569408711969
[9]  
Bergstrom Theodore C., 1982, The Value of Life and Safety, P3
[10]  
*BROWN VENC ASS IN, 2001, REF FUND COST SURV S