The effect of RAD51 135 G>C and XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk among Caucasians: a meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Shi, Shujing [1 ]
Qin, Lingyan [2 ]
Tian, Mengqiu [1 ]
Xie, Mao [1 ]
Li, Xiaoxue [1 ]
Qi, Chenglin [1 ]
Yi, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Clin Lab, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
RAD51; XRCC2; Polymorphism; Ovarian cancer; Meta-analysis; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SURFACE EPITHELIAL-CELLS; DNA-REPAIR GENES; BREAST-CANCER; RAD51; XRCC2; ASSOCIATION; OVULATION; REGION; RECOMBINATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13277-014-1769-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Genetic polymorphisms of RAD51 135 G > C and XRCC2 G > A (rs3218536) have been reported to change the risk of ovarian cancer, but the results are controversial. To get a more precise result, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was carried out to get case-control studies published up to November 2013. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were conducted to estimate the effect of RAD51 135 G > C and XRCC2 G > A (rs3218536) polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk. A total of 13 independent case-control studies with 5,927 cases and 10,303 controls were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant association between RAD51 135 G > C polymorphism and risk of ovarian cancer. However, the result of total studies indicated the XRCC2 G > A (rs3218536) polymorphism could reduce the risk of ovarian cancer (heterozygote model AG vs. GG: OR = 0.877, 95 % CI = 0.770-0.999, P = 0.048; dominant model AA/AG vs. GG: OR = 0.864, 95 % CI = 0.763-0.979, P = 0.022). The result was still significant after Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium-violating studies were excluded (allele contrast A vs. G: OR = 0.836, 95 % CI = 0.74-0.943, P = 0.004; homozygote model AA vs. GG: OR = 0.562, 95 % CI = 0.317-0.994, P = 0.048; heterozygote model AG vs. GG: OR = 0.859, 95 % CI = 0.753-0.98, P = 0.023; dominant model AA/AG vs. GG: OR = 0.842, 95 % CI = 0.74-0.958, P = 0.009). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly reduced risk was observed among Caucasians in dominant model (AA/AG vs. GG: OR = 0.867, 95 % CI = 0.764-0.984, P = 0.027). No significant association was found between the RAD51 135G > C polymorphism and the risk of ovarian cancer. Interestingly, XRCC2 G > A (rs3218536) polymorphism might reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. Larger-scale and well-designed studies are needed to further clarify the association.
引用
收藏
页码:5797 / 5804
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Meta-analyses of molecular association studies: Methodologic lessons for genetic epidemiology [J].
Attia, J ;
Thakkinstian, A ;
D'Este, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (04) :297-303
[2]   Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and epithelial ovarian cancer risk [J].
Auranen, A ;
Song, HL ;
Waterfall, C ;
DiCioccio, RA ;
Kuschel, B ;
Kjaer, SK ;
Hogdall, E ;
Hogdall, C ;
Stratton, J ;
Whittemore, AS ;
Easton, DF ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Novik, KL ;
Dunning, AM ;
Gayther, S ;
Pharoah, PDP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 117 (04) :611-618
[3]   Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded break repair [J].
Baumann, P ;
West, SC .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 23 (07) :247-251
[4]   Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in hormone metabolism and DNA repair genes and epithelial ovarian cancer: Results from two Australian studies and an additional validation set [J].
Beesley, Jonathan ;
Jordan, Susan J. ;
Spurdle, Amanda B. ;
Song, Honglin ;
Ramus, Susan J. ;
Kjaer, Suzanne Kruger ;
Hogdall, Estrid ;
DiCioccio, Richard A. ;
McGuire, Valerie ;
Whittemore, Alice S. ;
Gayther, Simon A. ;
Pharoah, Paul D. P. ;
Webb, Penelope M. ;
Chenevix-Trench, Georgia .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (12) :2557-2565
[5]   DNA repair gene XRCC2 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and susceptibility to cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract [J].
Benhamou, S ;
Tuimala, J ;
Bouchardy, C ;
Dayer, P ;
Sarasin, A ;
Hirvonen, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 112 (05) :901-904
[6]   Risk factors and risk reduction of breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Brekelmans, CTM .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (01) :63-68
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[9]   A NOTE ON GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF ESTIMATED ODDS RATIOS FROM SEVERAL CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
GALBRAITH, RF .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (08) :889-894
[10]   Genetic variation in the nucleoticle excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk [J].
García-Closas, M ;
Malats, N ;
Real, FX ;
Welch, R ;
Kogevinas, M ;
Chatterjee, N ;
Pfeiffer, R ;
Silverman, D ;
Dosemeci, M ;
Tardón, A ;
Serra, C ;
Carrato, A ;
García-Closas, R ;
Castaño-Vinyals, G ;
Chanock, S ;
Yeager, M ;
Rothman, N .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (03) :536-542