Comparison of Mandibular Advancement Splint and Tongue Stabilizing Device in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:82
作者
Deane, Sheryn A. [1 ]
Cistulli, Peter A. [2 ]
Ng, Andrew T. [3 ]
Zeng, Biao [3 ]
Petocz, Peter [4 ]
Darendeliler, M. Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Dent Hosp, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Royal N Shore Hosp, Woolcock Inst Med Res, Dept Resp Med, Ctr Sleep Hlth & Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] St George Hosp, Ctr Sleep Disorders & Resp Failure, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Macquarie Univ, Dept Stat, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
mandibular advancement splint; tongue stabilizing device; obstructive sleep apnea; ORAL APPLIANCE THERAPY; DAYTIME SLEEPINESS; RISK; CROSSOVER;
D O I
10.1093/sleep/32.5.648
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a novel tongue stabilizing device (TSD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design: A randomized crossover design was used. Patients: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, 7 female), recruited from a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Measurements and Results: The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced with MAS (11.68 +/- 8.94, P = 0.000) and TSD (13.15 +/- 10.77, P = 0.002) compared with baseline (26.96 +/- 17.17). The arousal index decreased for MAS (21.09 +/- 9.27, P = 0.004) and TSD (21.9 +/- 10.56, P = 0.001) compared with baseline (33.23 +/- 16.41). Sixty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete or partial response with MAS, compared with 45% with TSD. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was decreased with MAS (P = < 0.001) and TSD (P = 0.002). Subjective improvements in snoring and quality of sleep were reported, with a better response for MAS than TSD. Compliance was poorer for TSD, and the side effect profiles of the 2 modalities were different. All patients were satisfied with MAS compared to TSD, and 91% of patients preferred the MAS. Conclusion: Objective testing showed the MAS and TSD had similar efficacy in terms of AHI reduction. Patients reported improvements with both devices; however, better compliance and a clear preference for MAS was apparent when both devices were offered. Longer term studies are needed to clarify the role of TSD.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 653
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SLEEP DISORDERS [J].
ALDRICH, MS .
SLEEP, 1989, 12 (06) :487-494
[2]   SLEEP-DISORDERED BREATHING IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING ELDERLY [J].
ANCOLIISRAEL, S ;
KRIPKE, DF ;
KLAUBER, MR ;
MASON, WJ ;
FELL, R ;
KAPLAN, O .
SLEEP, 1991, 14 (06) :486-495
[3]  
Battagel JM, 1996, EUR J ORTHODONT, V18, P557
[4]   A randomized, controlled crossover trial of two oral appliances for sleep apnea treatment [J].
Bloch, KE ;
Iseli, A ;
Zhang, JN ;
Xie, XB ;
Kaplan, V ;
Stoeckli, PW ;
Russi, EW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 162 (01) :246-251
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF A NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA - THE TONGUE-RETAINING DEVICE [J].
CARTWRIGHT, RD ;
SAMELSON, CF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (06) :705-709
[6]  
CARTWRIGHT RD, 1985, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V111, P385
[7]  
CISTULLI P, 1994, SLEEP BREATHING
[8]   A randomized crossover study of an oral appliance vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnea [J].
Ferguson, KA ;
Ono, T ;
Lowe, AA ;
Keenan, SP ;
Fleetham, JA .
CHEST, 1996, 109 (05) :1269-1275
[9]   Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: A review [J].
Ferguson, Kathleen A. ;
Cartwright, Rosalind ;
Rogers, Robert ;
Schmidt-Nowara, Wolfgang .
SLEEP, 2006, 29 (02) :244-262
[10]   Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: Recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research [J].
Flemons, WW ;
Buysse, D ;
Redline, S ;
Pack, A ;
Strohl, K ;
Wheatley, J ;
Young, T ;
Douglas, N ;
Levy, P ;
McNicholas, W ;
Fleetham, J ;
White, D ;
Schmidt-Nowarra, W ;
Carley, D ;
Romaniuk, J .
SLEEP, 1999, 22 (05) :667-689