What do customers want? The impact of pricing tactic persuasion knowledge and frequency of exposure

被引:3
作者
Chen, Yen-Ting [1 ]
Lan, Li-Chi [1 ]
Fang, Wen-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Business Adm, New Taipei, Taiwan
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2021年 / 123卷 / 07期
关键词
Pricing tactic persuasion knowledge; Vice food; Virtue food; Product management; Consumer marketing; Pricing policy;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-04-2020-0343
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose Previous research has shown that consumers prefer a bonus pack to a price discount for virtue foods, whereas they prefer a price discount to a bonus pack for vice foods. Acting as a guilt-mitigating mechanism, a price discount justifies consumers' purchasing behavior, allowing them to save money and consume less vice foods. However, for virtue foods, neither the anticipated post-consumption guilt nor the resulting need for justification lead consumers to prefer a bonus pack to a price discount. This study investigates whether product promotions remain effective with other moderating variables. Design/methodology/approach The authors use pricing tactic persuasion knowledge (PTPK), which refers to the consumer persuasion knowledge of marketers' pricing tactics, as a lens to understand whether the power of these promotions could be enhanced or mitigated. The authors inferred that increasing the frequency of exposure to these foods could positively influence consumers' purchasing choices. They conducted three studies to examine these effects. In Study 1, using pearl milk tea (vice food) and sugar-free tea (virtue food), the authors contended that consumers would prefer a price discount when purchasing pearl milk tea, but a bonus pack when purchasing sugar-free tea. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors varied the participants' frequency of exposure to photographs of people in everyday situations with vice (virtue) foods. Findings In Study 1, PTPK was shown to be more predictive of consumer choices regarding price discounts and bonus packs. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors contended that increased exposure to vice (virtue) foods increases the selection of vice (virtue) foods by participants who were unaware of having been exposed to vice (virtue) foods. Originality/value This research has not only made quite managerial and policy implications for marketing but also brought the theoretical contributions for marketing researches. This research demonstrates that either for vice foods or virtue foods, a price discount is preferred to a bonus pack.
引用
收藏
页码:2321 / 2334
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Answering questions about questions: A persuasion knowledge perspective for understanding the effects of rhetorical questions [J].
Ahluwalia, R ;
Burnkrant, RE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :26-42
[2]   HOW PROMOTIONS WORK [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
BRIESCH, R ;
FOX, EJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G122-G132
[3]   Comparative price advertising: An integrative review [J].
Compeau, LD ;
Grewal, D .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 1998, 17 (02) :257-273
[4]  
DIAMOND WD, 1990, ADV CONSUM RES, V17, P488
[5]  
DIAMOND WD, 1992, J RETAILING, V68, P254
[6]   THE PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE MODEL - HOW PEOPLE COPE WITH PERSUASION ATTEMPTS [J].
FRIESTAD, M ;
WRIGHT, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (01) :1-31
[7]   Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics [J].
Hardesty, David M. ;
Bearden, William O. ;
Carlson, Jay P. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2007, 83 (02) :199-210
[8]   Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods [J].
Haynes, SN ;
Richard, DCS ;
Kubany, ES .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :238-247
[9]   Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability [J].
Inman, JJ ;
Zeelenberg, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (01) :116-128
[10]   WORD VALUES, WORD-FREQUENCY, AND VISUAL DURATION THRESHOLDS [J].
JOHNSON, RC ;
THOMSON, CW ;
FRINCKE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1960, 67 (05) :332-342