Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

被引:52
作者
Wixson, RL [1 ]
Stulberg, D [1 ]
VanFlandern, GJ [1 ]
Puri, L [1 ]
机构
[1] NORTHWESTERN UNIV, SCH MED, DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG, JOINT RECONSTRUCT & IMPLANT SERV, CHICAGO, IL 60611 USA
关键词
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; bone remodeling; uncemented femoral implant; proximal porous coating; femur; hip prosthesis;
D O I
10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90191-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Bone ingrowth into uncemented femoral implants with proximal porous coatings has been designed to avoid proximal stress shielding and preserve femoral strength. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry allows repeated quantitative analysis of anteroposterior scans of the proximal femur. By use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and qualitative radiographic changes, 31 total hip arthroplasties with an individually designed, proximally porous-coated prosthesis were evaluated after surgery and at intervals up to 2 years. All implants appeared to achieve successful bone ingrowth and subsequent remodeling. At the most proximal level around the neck osteotomy, the postoperative loss of bone density al 6 months was -14.5%, which persisted at 24 months with -11.6%. At the level of the distal portion of the porous coating in the lower metaphysis, the density change was -8.7%, but bone had remodeled at 24 months with a change in density of only -1.0% compared with the immediate postoperative scan. With a design that results in reliable proximal ingrowth, this study predicts that after an initial decline in bone density, a positive bone remodeling response occurs that could lead to long-term stable fixation of the femoral implant.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 372
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT RE
[2]   DISCRIMINATION OF TOTAL-BODY BONE-MINERAL DENSITY MEASURED BY DEXA IN VERTEBRAL OSTEOPOROSIS [J].
BAGUR, A ;
VEGA, E ;
MAUTALEN, C .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (04) :263-267
[3]  
BOBYN JD, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
[4]  
BOBYN JD, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V166, P301
[5]  
CALLAGHAN JJ, 1986, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V68, P1430
[6]  
CHECOVICH MM, 1994, T ORTHOP RES SOC, V19, P576
[7]  
Ciccotti M G, 1994, J Arthroplasty, V9, P631, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90117-1
[8]   ACCURACY OF DEXA MEASUREMENT OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY AFTER TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
COHEN, B ;
RUSHTON, N .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (03) :479-483
[9]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PERI-PROSTHETIC BONE-MINERAL DENSITY-MEASUREMENT USING 2 DIFFERENT DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY SYSTEMS [J].
COHEN, B ;
RUSHTON, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (801) :852-855
[10]  
CUMMINGS SR, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1429