Psychometric Properties of Three New National Survey of Student Engagement Based Engagement Scales: An Item Response Theory Analysis

被引:24
作者
Carle, Adam C. [1 ]
Jaffee, David [2 ]
Vaughan, Neil W. [1 ]
Eder, Douglas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Florida, Dept Psychol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Univ N Florida, Acad Affairs, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[3] Univ N Florida, Inst Effectiveness, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Student engagement; Item response theory; Test reliability; Measurement; Transformational learning; Community learning; Student faculty interaction; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; OUTCOMES; NSSE;
D O I
10.1007/s11162-009-9141-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We sought to develop and psychometrically describe three new student engagement scales to measure college students' engagement with their faculty (student-faculty engagement: SFE), community-based activities (CBA), and transformational learning opportunities (TLO) using items selected from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), a widely used, standardized student engagement survey. We used confirmatory factor analysis for ordered-categorical measures, item response theory (IRT), and data from 941 US college students' NSSE responses. Our findings indicated acceptable construct validity. The scales measured related but separable areas of engagement. IRT demonstrated that scores on the student-faculty engagement scale offered the most precise measurement in the middle range of student-faculty engagement. The CBA scale most reliably measured above average engagement, while TLO scores provided relatively precise descriptions of engagement across this spectrum. Findings support these scales' utility in institutional efforts to describe "local" student engagement, as well as efforts to use these scales in cross-institutional comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 794
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURAL EQUATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IRTFIT: A macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Differential Item Functioning
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research
[5]  
Astin A. W., 1993, WHAT MATTERS COLL 4
[6]  
Astin AW, 1998, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V39, P251
[7]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[8]   Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages [J].
Carini, Robert M. ;
Kuh, George D. ;
Klein, Stephen P. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 47 (01) :1-32
[9]  
Chickering A.W., 1987, The Wingspread Journal, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0
[10]   Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques - DIFdetect and difwithpar [J].
Crane, Paul K. ;
Gibbons, Laura E. ;
Jolley, Lance ;
van Belle, Gerald .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (11) :S115-S123