Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Ng, W. K. [1 ]
Wong, C. K. K. [2 ]
Fung, E. P. Y. [2 ]
Wong, C. W. [2 ]
Mak, W. S. [2 ]
Kwok, K. M. [2 ]
Lam, H. S. [2 ]
Cho, H. Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tuen Mun, 23 Tsing Chung Koon Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Yaumatei, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2019年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging/methods; Prognosis; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; MRI; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; LESIONS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.12809/hkjr1916975
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Methods: All patients with breast cancer who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent surgery in Kwong Wah Hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The ADC values of the malignant lesions were recorded and compared with tumour size (>= 2 cm, <2 cm), tumour grading (modified Bloom-Richardson-Elston grade 1, 2, 3), tumour aggressiveness (ductal in situ carcinoma and grade 1 invasive carcinomas, grade 2-3 invasive carcinomas), axillary lymph node status (positive, negative), oestrogen receptor expression (positive, negative), progesterone receptor expression (positive, negative), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor status (positive, negative). Results: 100 patients with 102 lesions were included in this study, of which 88 were invasive carcinomas and 14 were ductal carcinoma in situ. There was a significant difference between mean ADC value and tumour grading (p < 0.001), with an inverse correlation (Kendall's tau-b = -0339; p < 0.001). The association was independent of other prognostic factors, as shown by multiple linear regression. The mean ADC value of axillary lymph node- positive breast cancers was significantly lower than that of axillary lymph node-negative cancers (p = 0.023), with a significant inverse correlation (r(pb) = -0226; p=0.023), but the association was not independent of other prognostic factors. ADC value showed good predictive value in predicting tumour aggressiveness, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.717. Conclusion: Lower ADC values are well correlated with higher histological grade; therefore, ADC can be considered as a promising prognostic parameter for the evaluation of invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 106
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Utility of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Discriminating Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Domalik, Agnieszka
    Cwierz, Anna
    Kasperkiewicz, Hanna
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 79 : 450 - 455
  • [32] Correlation of Shear-Wave Elastography and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Breast Cancer and Their Relationship with the Prognostic Factors
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Acar, Cagdas Riza
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [33] Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging of Breast and Correlation of Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer
    Yirgin, Inci Kizildag
    Arslan, Gozde
    Ozturk, Enis
    Yirgin, Hakan
    Tasdemir, Nihat
    Gemici, Aysegul Akdogan
    Kabul, Fatma Celik
    Kaya, Eyup
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (03) : 301 - 307
  • [34] Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlation with Prognostic Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR
    Akin, Yasin
    Ugurlu, M. Umit
    Kaya, Handan
    Aribal, Erkin
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2016, 12 (03): : 123 - 132
  • [35] Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio as Prognostic Factors for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
    Buss, Arvids
    Radzina, Maija
    Liepa, Mara
    Birkenfelds, Edgars
    Saule, Laura
    Miculis, Karlis
    Mikelsone, Madara
    Vjaters, Egils
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (21)
  • [36] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal breast tissue with benign and malignant breast lesions
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Basara, Isil
    Coskun, Teoman
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (11) : 737 - 743
  • [37] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Measured by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Predict Chemoradiotherapeutic Effect for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Aoyagi, Tomoyoshi
    Shuto, Kiyohiko
    Okazumi, Shinichi
    Shimada, Hideaki
    Kazama, Toshiki
    Matsubara, Hisahiro
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (04) : 252 - 257
  • [38] Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Lesions
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Villonio, Antonio
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Rabasco, Paola
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2015, 33 (05) : 159 - 164
  • [39] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Maximum Standardized Uptake Values With Prognostic Factors
    Karan, Belgin
    Pourbagher, Aysin
    Torun, Nese
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (06) : 1434 - 1444
  • [40] Diffusion weighted imaging for the differentiation of breast tumors: From apparent diffusion coefficient to high order diffusion tensor imaging
    Teruel, Jose R.
    Goa, Pal E.
    Sjobakk, Torill E.
    Ostlie, Agnes
    Fjosne, Hans E.
    Bathen, Tone F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (05) : 1111 - 1121