Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech

被引:84
作者
Souza, Pamela [1 ]
Rosen, Stuart [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London WC1N 2PF, England
关键词
TEMPORAL CUES; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; MULTICHANNEL COMPRESSION; PHONEME RECOGNITION; PITCH PERCEPTION; MODULATION; CHANNELS; HEARING; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1121/1.3158835
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The choice of processing parameters for vocoded signals may have an important effect on the availability of various auditory features. Experiment I varied envelope cutoff frequency (30 and 300 Hz), carrier type (sine and noise), and number of bands (2-5) for vocoded speech presented to normal-hearing listeners. Performance was better with a high cutoff for sine-vocoding, with no effect of cutoff for noise-vocoding. With a low cutoff, performance was better for noise-vocoding than for sine-vocoding. With a high cutoff, performance was better for sine-vocoding. Experiment 2 measured perceptibility of cues to voice pitch variations. A noise carrier combined with a high cutoff allowed intonation to be perceived to some degree but performance was best in high-cutoff sine conditions. A low cutoff led to poorest performance, regardless of carrier. Experiment 3 tested the relative contributions of comodulation across bands and spectral density to improved performance with a sine carrier and high cutoff. Comodulation across bands had no effect so it appears that sidebands providing a denser spectrum improved performance. These results indicate that carrier type in combination with envelope cutoff can alter the available cues in vocoded speech, factors which must be considered in interpreting results with vocoded signals. (C) 2009 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3158835]
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 805
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A comparison of monotic and dichotic complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss [J].
Arehart, KH ;
Burns, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (02) :993-997
[2]   Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending? [J].
Barker, J ;
Cooke, M .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 1999, 27 (3-4) :159-174
[3]  
Bench J., 1979, SPEECH HEARING TESTS
[4]   Multichannel Compression: Effects of Reduced Spectral Contrast on Vowel Identification [J].
Bor, Stephanie ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Wright, Richard .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (05) :1315-1327
[5]   PLAYED-AGAIN SAM - FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE PITCH OF AMPLITUDE-MODULATED NOISE [J].
BURNS, EM ;
VIEMEISTER, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 70 (06) :1655-1660
[6]   NON-SPECTRAL PITCH [J].
BURNS, EM ;
VIEMEISTER, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 60 (04) :863-869
[7]   THE EFFECT OF AMPLITUDE COMODULATION ON AUDITORY OBJECT FORMATION IN SENTENCE PERCEPTION [J].
CARRELL, TD ;
OPIE, JM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1992, 52 (04) :437-445
[8]   Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants [J].
Chang, Yi-ping ;
Fu, Qian-Jie .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (06) :1331-1341
[9]   Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition [J].
Chatterjee, Monita ;
Peng, Shu-Chen .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 235 (1-2) :143-156
[10]  
CLARK N, 2007, GAMMATONE TOOL KIT V