Modelling reveals endogenous osmotic adaptation of storage tissue water potential as an important driver determining different stem diameter variation patterns in the mangrove species Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa

被引:16
作者
Vandegehuchte, Maurits W. [1 ]
Guyot, Adrien [2 ]
Hubeau, Michiel [1 ]
De Swaef, Tom [3 ]
Lockington, David A. [2 ]
Steppe, Kathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Plant Ecol Lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Civil Engn, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res ILVO, Plant Sci Unit, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
关键词
Functional-structural modelling; Avicennia marina; Rhizophora stylosa; stem diameter variation; dendrometer; osmotic water potential; endogenous control; mangrove; plant water relations; osmotic regulation; growth; mechanistic model; sap flow; SAP FLOW; AUSTRALIAN MANGROVES; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; BIOPHYSICAL ANALYSIS; PHLOEM TRANSPORT; CELL ELONGATION; SUGAR-TRANSPORT; RADIUS CHANGES; NORWAY SPRUCE; SCOTS PINE;
D O I
10.1093/aob/mct311
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background Stem diameter variations are mainly determined by the radial water transport between xylem and storage tissues. This radial transport results from the water potential difference between these tissues, which is influenced by both hydraulic and carbon related processes. Measurements have shown that when subjected to the same environmental conditions, the co-occurring mangrove species Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa unexpectedly show a totally different pattern in daily stem diameter variation. Methods Using in situ measurements of stem diameter variation, stem water potential and sap flow, a mechanistic flow and storage model based on the cohesion-tension theory was applied to assess the differences in osmotic storage water potential between Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa. Key results Both species, subjected to the same environmental conditions, showed a resembling daily pattern in simulated osmotic storage water potential. However, the osmotic storage water potential of R. stylosa started to decrease slightly after that of A. marina in the morning and increased again slightly later in the evening. This small shift in osmotic storage water potential likely underlaid the marked differences in daily stem diameter variation pattern between the two species. Conclusions The results show that in addition to environmental dynamics, endogenous changes in the osmotic storage water potential must be taken into account in order to accurately predict stem diameter variations, and hence growth.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 676
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ball MC, 1988, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V2, P129, DOI 10.1007/BF00196018
[2]   Drought effects on water relations in beech: The contribution of exchangeable water reservoirs [J].
Betsch, P. ;
Bonal, D. ;
Breda, N. ;
Montpied, P. ;
Peiffer, M. ;
Tuzet, A. ;
Granier, A. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (05) :531-543
[3]   Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters -: systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets [J].
Brun, R ;
Kühni, M ;
Siegrist, H ;
Gujer, W ;
Reichert, P .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (16) :4113-4127
[4]  
BUCK AL, 1981, J APPL METEOROL, V20, P1527, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1527:NEFCVP>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
DAINTY JACK, 1963, ADVAN BOT RES, V1, P279, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60183-4
[7]  
Dale J. E., 1986, Proceedings, North Central Weed Control Conference., P1
[8]   Experimental analysis of the role of water and carbon in tree stem diameter variations [J].
Daudet, FA ;
Améglio, T ;
Cochard, H ;
Archilla, O ;
Lacointe, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2005, 56 (409) :135-144
[9]   Identifiability analysis and improvement of a tree water flow and storage model [J].
De Pauw, D. J. W. ;
Steppe, K. ;
De Baets, B. .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2008, 211 (02) :314-332
[10]   Unravelling the output uncertainty of a tree water flow and storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods [J].
De Pauw, Dirk J. W. ;
Steppe, Kathy ;
De Baets, Bernard .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 101 (01) :87-99