ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation using PET in proton therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Masuda, Takamitsu [1 ]
Nishio, Teiji [1 ]
Kataoka, Jun [2 ]
Arimoto, Makoto [3 ]
Sano, Akira [1 ]
Karasawa, Kumiko [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Shinjuku Ku, 8-1 Kawadacho, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
[2] Waseda Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn, Dept Pure & Appl Phys, Shinjuku Ku, 3-4-1 Okubo, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[3] Kanazawa Univ, Inst Sci & Engn, Fac Math & Phys, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9201192, Japan
[4] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shinjuku Ku, 8-1 Kawadacho, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2019年 / 64卷 / 17期
关键词
proton therapy; PET imaging; dose estimation; filtering; ML-EM algorithm; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; IN-BEAM; VERIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; WASHOUT; MAXIMUM; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab3276
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied and clinically investigated for dose verification in proton therapy. However, the production distributions of positron emitters are not proportional to the dose distribution. Thus, direct dose evaluation is limited when using the conventional PET-based approach. We propose a method for estimating the dose distribution from the positron emitter distributions using the maximum likelihood (ML) expectation maximization (EM) algorithm combined with filtering. In experiments to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, mono-energetic and spread-out Bragg-peak proton beams were delivered by a synchrotron, and a water target was irradiated at clinical dose levels. Planar PET measurements were performed during beam pauses and after irradiation over a total period of 200 s. In addition, we conducted a Monte Carlo simulation to obtain the required filter functions and analyze the influence of the number of algorithm iterations on estimation. We successfully estimated the 2D dose distributions even under statistical noise in the PET images. The accuracy of the 2D dose estimation was about 10% for both beams at the 1-sigma values of relative error. This value is comparable to the deviations in the measured PET activity distributions. For the laterally integrated profile along the beam direction, a low error within 5% was obtained per irradiation value. Moreover, the difference of estimated proton ranges was within 1 mm, and 2D estimation from the PET images was completed in 21 ms. Hence, the proposed algorithm may be applied to real-time dose monitoring. Although this is the first attempt to use the ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation, the proposed method showed high accuracy and speed in the estimation of proton dose distribution from PET data. The proposed method is thus a step forward to exploit the full potential of PET for in vivo dose verification.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extension of the ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation using PET in proton therapy: application to an inhomogeneous target
    Masuda, Takamitsu
    Nishio, Teiji
    Sano, Akira
    Karasawa, Kumiko
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (18):
  • [2] Superiorization of the ML-EM Algorithm
    Garduno, Edgar
    Herman, Gabor T.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2014, 61 (01) : 162 - 172
  • [3] Event reconstruction in NEXT using the ML-EM algorithm
    Simon, A.
    Ferrario, P.
    Izmaylov, A.
    NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 273 : 2624 - 2626
  • [4] The role of the updating coefficient of the ML-EM algorithm in PET image reconstruction
    Gaitanis, A.
    Kontaxakis, G.
    Panayiotakis, G.
    Spyrou, G.
    Tzanakos, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S314 - S314
  • [5] Spatiotemporal PET Reconstruction Using ML-EM with Learned Diffeomorphic Deformation
    Oktem, Ozan
    Pouchol, Camille
    Verdier, Olivier
    MACHINE LEARNING FOR MEDICAL IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION, MLMIR 2019, 2019, 11905 : 151 - 162
  • [6] The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise
    Zeng, Gengsheng L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2015, 62 (05) : 2096 - 2101
  • [7] Improvement in the quantitative accuracy and quality of pet images reconstructed by ML-EM algorithm
    Oishi, Yukihiro
    Ishii, Keizo
    Yamazaki, Hiromichi
    Matsuyama, Shigeo
    Kikuchi, Youhei
    Rodriguez, Mario
    Suzuki, Atsuro
    Yamaguchi, Takashi
    Itoh, Masatoshi
    Watanuki, Shoichi
    FUTURE MEDICAL ENGINEERING BASED ON BIONANOTECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 805 - +
  • [8] The ML-EM Algorithm Is Not Optimal For Poisson Noise
    Zeng, Gengsheng L.
    2015 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2015,
  • [9] Application and performance of an ML-EM algorithm in NEXT
    Simon, A.
    Lerche, C.
    Monrabal, F.
    Gomez-Cadenas, J. J.
    Alvarez, V.
    Azevedo, C. D. R.
    Benlloch-Rodriguez, J. M.
    Borges, F. I. G. M.
    Botas, A.
    Carcel, S.
    Carrion, J. V.
    Cebrian, S.
    Conde, C. A. N.
    Diaz, J.
    Diesburg, M.
    Escada, J.
    Esteve, R.
    Felkai, R.
    Fernandes, L. M. P.
    Ferrario, P.
    Ferreira, A. L.
    Freitas, E. D. C.
    Goldschmidt, A.
    Gonzalez-Diaz, D.
    Gutierrez, R. M.
    Hauptman, J.
    Henriques, C. A. O.
    Hernandez, A. I.
    Hernando Morata, J. A.
    Herrero, V.
    Jones, B. J. P.
    Labarga, L.
    Laing, A.
    Lebrun, P.
    Liubarsky, I.
    Lopez-March, N.
    Losada, M.
    Martin-Albo, J.
    Martinez-Lema, G.
    Martinez, A.
    McDonald, A. D.
    Monteiro, C. M. B.
    Mora, F. J.
    Moutinho, L. M.
    Munoz Vidal, J.
    Musti, M.
    Nebot-Guinot, M.
    Novella, P.
    Nygren, D. R.
    Palmeiro, B.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2017, 12
  • [10] The ML-EM algorithm in continuum: sparse measure solutions
    Pouchol, Camille
    Verdier, Olivier
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2020, 36 (03)