The financial support for the care of children : the effects on the work of women, the income of families and the public finances

被引:1
作者
Clavet, Nicholas-James [1 ]
Duclos, Jean-Yves [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, CIRPEE, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, CIRPEE, CIRANO, IZA, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES | 2014年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
Child care services; work subsidies; labor supply; family policy; family policy in Quebec; EMPLOYMENT; SINGLE; IMPACTS; CHOICES; CANADA; QUEBEC; MODEL;
D O I
10.3138/cpp.2012-029
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public funding of child care (CC) features prominently in the achievement of several social objectives in Quebec and across Canada. This article provides evidence on the impact of three main measures of public CC funding in Quebec (the provincial tax credit, the federal income tax deduction, and the direct subsidies to early childhood centers) on family income, female labor market participation and provincial and federal public finances. Unlike the existing Canadian literature, this impact is estimated using a structural model of labor supply that explicitly incorporates the work/leisure preferences of families. This model also takes into account the provincial and federal tax and transfer system, the effect of fixed costs to working, the variability of the costs of CC, and the distribution of the socio-demographic characteristics of Quebec families. Public CC funding increases family income significantly (after taxes, transfers and CC expenses); it also has a greater impact on incomes and female labor market participation for single mothers than for biparental families. Cuts in public CC funding would result in substantial savings for the provincial government but would have little impact on the federal government.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 244
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Tax credits, labor supply, and child care [J].
Averett, SL ;
Peters, HE ;
Waldman, DM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (01) :125-135
[2]   Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being [J].
Baker, Michael ;
Gruber, Jonathan ;
Milligan, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 116 (04) :709-745
[3]   Innis Lecture: Universal early childhood interventions: what is the evidence base? [J].
Baker, Michael .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2011, 44 (04) :1069-1105
[4]   Family Policies in Quebec and the Rest of Canada: Implications for Fertility, Child-Care, Women's Paid Work, and Child Development Indicators [J].
Beaujot, Roderic ;
Du, Ching Jiangqin ;
Ravanera, Zenaida .
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2013, 39 (02) :221-239
[5]  
Bourguignon F., 2006, J ECON INEQUAL, V4, P77, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10888-005-9012-6
[6]   Maximum fee versus child benefit: a welfare analysis of Swedish child-care fee reform [J].
Brink, Anna ;
Nordblom, Katarina ;
Wahlberg, Roger .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2007, 14 (04) :457-480
[7]   Bounds on Elasticities With Optimization Frictions: A Synthesis of Micro and Macro Evidence on Labor Supply [J].
Chetty, Raj .
ECONOMETRICA, 2012, 80 (03) :969-1018
[8]  
Clavet N.-J., 2011, 1129 CIRPEE
[9]   Fighting Poverty: Assessing the Effect of Guaranteed Minimum Income Proposals in Quebec [J].
Clavet, Nicholas-James ;
Duclos, Jean-Yves ;
Lacroix, Guy .
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2013, 39 (04) :491-516
[10]  
Cleveland G., 2008, 12 IRPP