Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis

被引:44
作者
Song, Peng [1 ]
Lu, Ming [1 ]
Yin, Qin [2 ]
Wu, Lei [3 ]
Zhang, Dong [1 ]
Fu, Bo [1 ]
Wang, Baolin [1 ]
Zhao, Qinghong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Med Ctr Pediat, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Lab Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Red meat; Stomach cancer; Cancer prevention; Meta-analysis; N-NITROSO COMPOUNDS; GASTRIC-CANCER; PROCESSED MEAT; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI; ESOPHAGEAL; ADENOCARCINOMAS; ASSOCIATION; PROTEIN; IRON; DIET;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. We performed a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies to provide a quantitative assessment of this association. Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase before December 2013 without restrictions. A total of 18 studies involving 1,228,327 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Summary relative risks were estimated using random effects models. The pooled relative risks of gastric cancer were 1.37 (95 % CI 1.18-1.59) for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake with significant heterogeneity among studies (P (heterogeneity) < 0.001, I (2) = 67.6 %). When stratified by the study design, the significant associations were observed in population-based case-control studies (RR 1.58; 95 % CI 1.22-2.06; P (heterogeneity) < 0.001, I (2) = 73.0 %) and hospital-based case-control studies (RR 1.63; 95 % CI 1.38-1.92; P (heterogeneity) = 0.284, I (2) = 19.1 %). However, no association was observed among cohort studies (RR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.83-1.20; P (heterogeneity) = 0.158, I (2) = 33.9 %). The significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (a parts per thousand yen2000), sample size (< 1,000, a parts per thousand yen1,000) and quality score (< 7 stars, a parts per thousand yen7 stars). The dose-response analysis associated every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake with a 17 % increased gastric cancer risk (RR 1.17; 95 % CI 1.05-1.32). A linear regression model further revealed that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption. Increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Further larger prospective studies are warranted to verify this association.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 992
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CA CANC J CLIN, DOI DOI 10.3322/CAAC.20107
[2]   Red and processed meat intake and risk of colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies [J].
Aune, Dagfinn ;
Chan, Doris S. M. ;
Vieira, Ana Rita ;
Rosenblatt, Deborah A. Navarro ;
Vieira, Rui ;
Greenwood, Darren C. ;
Kampman, Ellen ;
Norat, Teresa .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (04) :611-627
[3]  
Aune D, 2009, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V10, P429
[4]  
Compare D, 2010, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V14, P302
[5]  
Cross AJ, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P2358
[6]   Meat Consumption and Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer in a Large Prospective Study [J].
Cross, Amanda J. ;
Freedman, Neal D. ;
Ren, Jiansong ;
Ward, Mary H. ;
Hollenbeck, Albert R. ;
Schatzkin, Arthur ;
Sinha, Rashmi ;
Abnet, Christian C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (03) :432-442
[7]   Trends in meat consumption in the USA [J].
Daniel, Carrie R. ;
Cross, Amanda J. ;
Koebnick, Corinna ;
Sinha, Rashmi .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2011, 14 (04) :575-583
[8]   Dietary patterns and risk of gastric cancer: A case-control study in Uruguay [J].
De Stefani E. ;
Correa P. ;
Boffetta P. ;
Deneo-Pellegrini H. ;
Ronco A.L. ;
Mendilaharsu M. .
Gastric Cancer, 2004, 7 (4) :211-220
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463