EMPATHY: A Tool to Enhance Nonverbal Communication Between Clinicians and Their Patients

被引:121
作者
Riess, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Kraft-Todd, Gordon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Empathy & Relat Sci Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Human Cooperat Lab, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
NEURAL BASIS; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH OUTCOMES; CENTERED CARE; EMOTION; MODEL; TOUCH; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000000287
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is a gap in the medical education literature on teaching nonverbal detection and expression of empathy. Many articles do not address nonverbal interactions, instead focusing on "what to say" rather than "how to be." This focus on verbal communication overlooks the essential role nonverbal signals play in the communication of emotions, which has significant effects on patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and malpractice claims. This gap is addressed with a novel teaching tool for assessing nonverbal behavior using the acronym E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.-E: eye contact; M: muscles of facial expression; P: posture; A: affect; T: tone of voice; H: hearing the whole patient; Y: your response. This acronym was the cornerstone of a randomized controlled trial of empathy training at Massachusetts General Hospital, 2010-2012. Used as an easy-to-remember checklist, the acronym orients medical professionals to key aspects of perceiving and responding to nonverbal emotional cues. An urgent need exists to teach nonverbal aspects of communication as medical practices must be reoriented to the increasing cultural diversity represented by patients presenting for care. Where language proficiency may be limited, nonverbal communication becomes more crucial for understanding patients' communications. Furthermore, even in the absence of cultural differences, many patients are reluctant to disagree with their clinicians, and subtle nonverbal cues may be the critical entry point for discussions leading to shared medical decisions. A detailed description of the E.M.P.A.T.H.Y. acronym and a brief summary of the literature that supports each component of the teaching tool are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1108 / 1112
页数:5
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces [J].
Adams, RB ;
Gordon, HL ;
Baird, AA ;
Ambady, N ;
Kleck, RE .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5625) :1536-1536
[2]   The Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :693-716
[3]   Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region [J].
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
McCarthy, G .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (07) :267-278
[4]  
Ambady N, 2002, PSYCHOL AGING, V17, P443, DOI [10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.443, 10.1037//0882-7974.17.3.443]
[5]   Surgeons' tone of voice: A clue to malpractice history [J].
Ambady, N ;
LaPlante, D ;
Nguyen, T ;
Rosenthal, R ;
Chaumeton, N ;
Levinson, W .
SURGERY, 2002, 132 (01) :5-9
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Nonverbal communication in human interaction
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1970, KINESICS CONTEXT ESS
[8]   Holistic Person Processing: Faces With Bodies Tell the Whole Story [J].
Aviezer, Hillel ;
Trope, Yaacov ;
Todorov, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 103 (01) :20-37
[9]   Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care [J].
Barry, Michael J. ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) :780-781
[10]  
Batson C.D., 1991, ALTRUISM QUESTION SO