Bargaining, production, and monotonicity in economic environments

被引:10
作者
Chen, MA [1 ]
Maskin, ES [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeth.1999.2562
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The automatic bargaining theory of J. Nash (1950. Econometrica 18. 155-162) presumes that only status quo utilities and the shape of the utility possibilities set are relevant to the bargaining outcome. Here we consider a class of economic problems for which bargaining solutions may depend on more than just utility information. (A fifty-fifty split of a single good between two bargainers is one example of such a solution.) It is shown that the requirements of Pareto efficiency), weak symmetry, and technological monotonicity (i.e., bargainers should gain from technological improvement) combine to characterize welfare egalitarianism. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: C78. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   PROPORTIONAL SOLUTIONS TO BARGAINING SITUATIONS - INTERPERSONAL UTILITY COMPARISONS [J].
KALAI, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (07) :1623-1630
[2]   OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASHS BARGAINING PROBLEM [J].
KALAI, E ;
SMORODINSKY, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 1975, 43 (03) :513-518
[3]   THE BARGAINING PROBLEM [J].
Nash, John F., Jr. .
ECONOMETRICA, 1950, 18 (02) :155-162
[4]   THE MISMARRIAGE OF BARGAINING THEORY AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE [J].
ROEMER, J .
ETHICS, 1986, 97 (01) :88-110
[5]  
Roemer J., 1996, Theories of Distributive Justice
[6]   AXIOMATIC BARGAINING THEORY ON ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTS [J].
ROEMER, JE .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1988, 45 (01) :1-31