Identifying key network characteristics for agricultural innovation: A multisectoral case study approach

被引:9
作者
Lambrecht, Evelien [1 ]
Crivits, Maarten [2 ]
Lauwers, Ludwig [1 ,2 ]
Gellynck, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Div Agrifood Mkt & Chain Management, Dept Agr Econ, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res ILVO, Social Sci Unit, Merelbeke, Belgium
关键词
Flanders; success factors; collaboration; knowledge exchange; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; FIRMS; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0030727018760604
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This article identified network characteristics critical for successful agricutural innovations within networks, or a set of interrelated organizations aiming at knowledge exchange for innovations. To explore key success factors, the research questioned how networks cope with innovation characteristics and combined network characteristics with four innovation characteristics in four agricultural sub-sectors. Data were collected from in-depth interviews with farmers and network coordinators and from focus group discussions with farmers active in Flanders, the northern part of Belgium. Factors particularly helpful for success in agricultural innovation networks include numerous contacts, integration of knowledge providers in the network structure, face-to-face communication, a self-initiated coalition and surpassing innovation beyond the mere agricultural level, through collaboration with people from outside the sector. The findings are useful for academics, network coordinators and network members, possibly leading to a higher innovation performance via networking.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BLACKWELL SCI LTD
[2]   Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions [J].
Beckman, CM ;
Haunschild, PR .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (01) :92-124
[3]   Perspectives of SME innovation clusters development in Russia [J].
Bek, Mikhail A. ;
Bek, Nadezda N. ;
Sheresheva, Marina Y. ;
Johnston, Wesley J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2013, 28 (03) :240-259
[4]   The contingent value of social capital [J].
Burt, RS .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (02) :339-365
[5]   Testing goodwill: conflict and cooperation in new product development networks [J].
Coles, AM ;
Harris, L ;
Dickson, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (1-2) :51-64
[6]  
EC, 2014, CALL CLOS RES INN DI
[7]   Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms [J].
Elfring, T ;
Hulsink, W .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (04) :409-422
[8]   NETWORK ANALYSIS, CULTURE, AND THE PROBLEM OF AGENCY [J].
EMIRBAYER, M ;
GOODWIN, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 99 (06) :1411-1454
[9]  
Hakansson H., 1995, DEV RELATIONSHIPS BU
[10]   The participatory and democratic potential and practice of interest groups: Between solidarity and representation [J].
Halpin, Darren R. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (04) :919-940