A multi-objective life cycle approach for optimal building design: A case study in Finnish context

被引:54
作者
Pal, Sudip Kumar [1 ]
Takano, Atsushi [2 ]
Alanne, Kari [1 ]
Palonen, Matti [1 ]
Siren, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, POB 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
[2] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Architecture & Architectural Engn, Kagoshima 890, Japan
关键词
Life cycle optimization; Embodied energy; Operational energy; Life cycle cost; Building envelope; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; EMBODIED ENERGY; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; INSULATION MATERIALS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; MATERIAL SELECTION; OFFICE BUILDINGS; COST; SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study demonstrates the possibility to use energy-cost optimal building designs based on life cycle approach. There is a lack of studies that cover the comprehensive assessment of both embodied energy (EE) and operational energy (OE) in a single optimization problem. The primary goal of the current study is to compare the optimized results of using OE+EE together and OE only. The optimization is performed on a case study building (townhouse) in Finland with three structural alternatives (i.e., reinforced concrete (RC); cross-laminated timber (CLT) and Steel). Different options for insulation thickness of external wall, roof, floor and window types were considered as decision variables as the scope of the present study is on building envelope. The objectives of the optimization are to minimize life cycle energy (LCE) and life cycle costs (LCC). The LCE difference between the most and least energy efficient solution on the pareto front is greater in case of the OE optimization, compared to OE+EE optimization. For all studied structures, the EE of the optimal solutions from OE+EE optimization ranges 16%-23% of LCE. Many of the non-dominated optimal solutions obtained from the OE+EE optimization shows a higher U-value for the building envelope components compared to the optimal solutions from the OE optimization. A relationship between both OE and EE with the overall thermal resistance of the building envelope is discussed to obtain a deeper understanding of such differences in U-value for the optimal solutions obtained from the OE+EE and OE optimization. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1035
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[51]  
Palolahti T., 2013, ROK RAKENNUSOSIEN KU
[52]  
Palonen M., 2013, 13 C INT BUILD PERF
[53]   Cost optimal and nearly zero energy building solutions for office buildings [J].
Pikas, E. ;
Thalfeldt, M. ;
Kurnitski, J. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 74 :30-42
[54]  
Rasmussen F. N., 2016, CLIMA 2016
[55]   Distribution network reliability improvements in presence of demand response [J].
Safdarian, Amir ;
Degefa, Merkebu Z. ;
Lehtonen, Matti ;
Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2014, 8 (12) :2027-2035
[56]  
Sahlin P., 1996, THESIS
[57]   Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article [J].
Sartori, I. ;
Hestnes, A. G. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2007, 39 (03) :249-257
[58]   Environmental assessment of facade-building systems and thermal insulation materials for different climatic conditions [J].
Sierra-Perez, Jorge ;
Boschmonart-Rives, Jesus ;
Gabarrell, Xavier .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 :102-113
[59]  
Statistics Finland, 2014, BUILD COST IND
[60]   Life cycle assessment approach for the optimization of sustainable building envelopes: An application on solar wall systems [J].
Stazi, Francesca ;
Mastrucci, Alessio ;
Munafo, Placido .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 58 :278-288