What parameters can be used to identify early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?

Elucidating the disease process of early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) will help clinicians in addressing the contentious issues of when and in which patients, therapeutic intervention should be initiated. Here, we discuss several possible parameters for diagnosing early IPF and their clinical impacts. Physiologically, early IPF can be considered as IPF with normal or mild impairment in pulmonary function. Radiologically, early IPF can be considered as IPF with a small extent and/or early features of fibrosis. Symptomatically, early IPF can be considered as asymptomatic or less symptomatic IPF. IPF at Gender-Age-Physiology index stage I can be considered early IPF. Interstitial lung abnormalities are defined as parenchymal abnormalities in more than 5% of the lung in patients with no prior history of interstitial lung disease, and in some cases, this seems to be equivalent to early IPF. Previous clinical trials showed the effect of antifibrotic therapies in early IPF, but the effects of therapy are uncertain in early IPF outside of clinical trials, such as in cases of IPF with normal pulmonary function, IPF without honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis, and asymptomatic IPF. Moreover, little has been reported on disease progression in such conditions. Because the conceptual framework of early IPF may vary depending on its definition, not only is a diagnosis of early IPF important but prediction of disease progression is also crucial. Further investigations are needed to identify biomarkers that can detect patients who may experience greater degrees of disease progression and require treatment even with those forms of early IPF. (c) 2020 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.