Quantifying fairness to overcome selfishness: A behavioural model to describe the evolution and stabilization of inter-group bias using the Ultimatum Game

被引:1
作者
Guazzini, Andrea [1 ,4 ]
Imbimbo, Enrico [1 ,4 ]
Stefanelli, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Bagnoli, Franco [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Venturino, Ezio [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Educ Languages Intercultures Literatures & P, Via di San Salvi,12,Bldg 26, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Phys & Astron, Via G Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
[3] INFN, Sez Firenze, Via G Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Ctr Study Complex Dynam CSDC, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Turin, Dept Math Giuseppe Peano, Via Carlo Alberto 10, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[6] INdAM Res Grp GNCS, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 USA
关键词
Inter-group favouritism; fairness; selfishness; agent-based modeling; Ultimatum Game; evolution; mathematical models; dynamical systems; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; DECISION-MAKING; COOPERATION; STAKES;
D O I
10.3934/mbe.2019184
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ability to form groups to overcome problems has been crucial for the evolution of human beings. To favour the formation of cooperating groups, one of the mechanisms developed is the inter-group bias, namely the tendency of individuals to favour members of their group and hinder the external ones. It is the cognitive equivalent of the "green beard effect" in evolutionary biology, introduced by Hamilton and popularized by Dawkins, for which a group can profit of the altruistic behaviour of its members. Here, we use a behavioural model based on the Ultimatum Game, to shed light on how this behaviour cloud has been stabilized in the human population, estimating the magnitude of favouritism needed to overcome selfish individuals. Through both numerical simulations and analytic approaches, we study how a community of collectivist and individualist agents evolves. The key factor is the mechanism for the evolution of the population, i.e., the replacement of the poor-performing individuals. In the case of replacement by the reproduction of existing individuals, we observe a smooth phase transition and no coexistence. If the replacement is random, the transition smooths, and coexistence is possible. We developed analytical approaches for these two cases and performed numerical simulations. Although analytical calculations support the behaviour emerging from simulations, some differences ask for more refined treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:3718 / 3733
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, POLIT PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203505984-16
[2]   Ingroup Favoritism in Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Wu, Junhui ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (06) :1556-1581
[3]   Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game [J].
Boarini, Romina ;
Laslier, Jean-Francois ;
Robin, Stephane .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2009, 67 (04) :341-373
[4]  
Bornstein Gary., 1998, EXP ECON, V11, P101, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009914001822
[5]   Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia [J].
Cameron, LA .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1999, 37 (01) :47-59
[6]   Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game, experiments [J].
Chuah, Swee-Hoon ;
Hoffmann, Robert ;
Jones, Martin ;
Williams, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 64 (01) :35-48
[7]  
Dawkins R., 1976, The selfish gene
[8]   Models of the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game: a review and classification [J].
Debove, Stephane ;
Baumard, Nicolas ;
Andre, Jean-Baptiste .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 (03) :245-254
[9]   CONFLICT BETWEEN INTUITIVE AND RATIONAL PROCESSING - WHEN PEOPLE BEHAVE AGAINST THEIR BETTER JUDGMENT [J].
DENESRAJ, V ;
EPSTEIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :819-829
[10]   The nature of human altruism [J].
Fehr, E ;
Fischbacher, U .
NATURE, 2003, 425 (6960) :785-791