The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on genomic imprinting and imprinting disorders

被引:44
作者
Uyar, Asli [1 ,2 ]
Seli, Emre [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Okan Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
assisted reproductive technologies; genomic imprinting; imprinting disorders; BECKWITH-WIEDEMANN-SYNDROME; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; DNA METHYLATION IMPRINTS; DIRECT REPEAT ELEMENT; ANGELMAN-SYNDROME; CONTROL REGION; PREIMPLANTATION DEVELOPMENT; EPIGENETIC STABILITY; ABNORMAL METHYLATION; GENE-EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0000000000000071
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of reviewGenomic imprinting refers to preferential allele-specific gene expression. DNA methylation-based molecular mechanisms regulate establishment and maintenance of parental imprints during early embryo development and gametogenesis. Because of the coincident timing, a potential association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures and imprinting defects has been investigated in various studies. In this review, we provide an overview of genomic imprinting and present a summary of the relevant clinical data.Recent findingsART procedures affect DNA methylation pattern, parental imprinting status, and imprinted gene expression in the mouse embryo. In humans, several case series suggested an association between ART and imprinting disorders, with a three-fold to six-fold higher prevalence of ART use among children born with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome compared to the general population. However, more recent studies failed to support these findings and could not demonstrate an association between imprinting disorders and ARTs, independent of subfertility.SummaryART procedures may affect methylation status of imprinted regions in the DNA, leading to imprinting disorders. Although the low prevalence of imprinting disorders makes it challenging to perform conclusive clinical trials, further studies in large registries are required to determine the real impact of ARTs on their occurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 221
页数:12
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies [J].
Amor, David J. ;
Halliday, Jane .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (12) :2826-2834
[2]   Culture of oocytes and risk of imprinting defects [J].
Anckaert, Ellen ;
De Rycke, Martine ;
Smitz, Johan .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2013, 19 (01) :52-66
[3]   Ammonium Accumulation and Use of Mineral Oil Overlay Do Not Alter Imprinting Establishment at Three Key Imprinted Genes in Mouse Oocytes Grown and Matured in a Long-Term Follicle Culture [J].
Anckaert, Ellen ;
Adriaenssens, Tom ;
Romero, Sergio ;
Smitz, Johan .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2009, 81 (04) :666-673
[4]   Unaltered imprinting establishment of key imprinted genes in mouse oocytes after in vitro follicle culture under variable follicle-stimulating hormone exposure [J].
Anckaert, Ellen ;
Adriaenssens, Tom ;
Romero, Sergio ;
Dremier, Sarah ;
Smitz, Johan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (04) :541-548
[5]   Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints [J].
Bourc'his, D ;
Xu, GL ;
Lin, CS ;
Bollman, B ;
Bestor, TH .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5551) :2536-2539
[6]   A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders [J].
Bowdin, Sarah ;
Allen, Cathy ;
Kirby, Gail ;
Brueton, Louise ;
Afnan, Masoud ;
Barratt, Christopher ;
Kirkman-Brown, Jackson ;
Harrison, Robert ;
Maher, Eamonn R. ;
Reardon, William .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (12) :3237-3240
[7]  
Cassidy SB, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V97, P136, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(200022)97:2<136::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-V
[9]   DIFFERENTIAL ACTIVITY OF MATERNALLY AND PATERNALLY DERIVED CHROMOSOME REGIONS IN MICE [J].
CATTANACH, BM ;
KIRK, M .
NATURE, 1985, 315 (6019) :496-498
[10]   Association between Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproductive technology: a case series of 19 patients [J].
Chang, AS ;
Moley, KH ;
Wangler, MDM ;
Feinberg, AP ;
DeBaun, MR .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) :349-354