An integrated undergraduate pain curriculum, based on IASP curricula, for six Health Science Faculties

被引:134
作者
Watt-Watson, J
Hunter, J
Pennefather, P
Librach, L
Raman-Wilms, L
Schreiber, M
Lax, L
Stinson, J
Dao, T
Gordon, A
Mock, D
Salter, M
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON M5G 1U7, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON M5S 2S2, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
关键词
undergraduate interprofessional pain education; Health Sciences;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.019
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Pain education, especially for undergraduates, has been identified as important to changing problematic pain practices, yet, no published data were found describing an integrated, interprofessional pain curriculum for undergraduate students. Therefore, this project aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an integrated pain curriculum, based on the International Association for the Study of Pain curricula [http:// www.iasp-pain.org/curropen.html], for 540 students from six Health Science Faculties/Departments. Over an 18-month period, the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain's Interfaculty Pain Education Committee developed a 20-h undergraduate pain curriculum to be delivered during a 1-week period. Students from Dentistry, Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy participated as part of their 2nd or 3rd year program. Teaching strategies included large and small groups, Standardized Patients, and 63 facilitators. Evaluation methods included: (a) pre- and post-tests of the Pain Knowledge and Beliefs Questionnaire (PKBQ) and (b) Daily Content and Process Questionnaire (DCPQ) to obtain feedback about process, content, and format across the curriculum's 5 days. A significant improvement in pain knowledge and beliefs was demonstrated (t = 181.28, P < 0.001), although non-responders were problematic at the post-test. DCPQ overall ratings of 'exceeding or meeting expectations' ranged from 74 to 92%. Ratings were highest for the patient-related content and panel, and the small-group discussions with Standardized Patients. Overall evaluations were positive, and statistically significant changes were demonstrated in students' pain knowledge and beliefs. This unique and valuable learning opportunity will be repeated with some modifications next year. (C) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 148
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Baldasano JM, 2001, ADV AIR POLLUT SER, V10, P173
[2]  
BARR H, 1996, ED HLTH, V9, P341
[3]  
Barr H., 2000, Evaluations of Inter-professional Education: A United Kingdom Revieti' for Health and Social Care
[4]  
Barr H., 1999, Br Educ Res J, V25, P533, DOI DOI 10.1080/0141192990250408
[5]  
Barr H., 1998, J INTERPROF CARE, V12, P181, DOI DOI 10.3109/13561829809014104
[6]   Student evaluation of an interactive, multidisciplinary clinical learning model [J].
Barrington, D ;
Rodger, M ;
Gray, L ;
Jones, B ;
Langridge, M ;
Marriott, R .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1998, 20 (06) :530-535
[7]  
CAIPE, 1997, INT ED DEF
[8]  
Clark P. G., 1993, J INTERPROF CARE, V7, P219
[9]   Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: a systematic review [J].
Cooper, H ;
Carlisle, C ;
Gibbs, T ;
Watkins, C .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (02) :228-237
[10]  
Fields HL., 1995, Core curriculum for professional education in pain