Structured assessment of ABET student outcomes 'a' and 'e' in mathematics for engineering students

被引:0
|
作者
Kadry, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beirut Arab Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Fac Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
来源
AUTOMATIC CONTROL, MECHATRONICS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING | 2019年
关键词
assessment; outcomes; ABET; accreditation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Student outcomes are statements that describe the attributes, skills and abilities that students should have by the time of graduation. For quality assurance evaluation, these outcomes must be assessed through the curriculum and extracurricular activities. In order to evaluate the level to which an outcome has been met, it is necessary to select some courses where the outcome is highly covered. Whether an outcome is 'highly' covered can be identified using Bloom's taxonomy levels, the number of hours of coverage, the weighting of its assessment and other parameters. Course goals must be linked to the student outcomes and defined in measurable terms. Using just the two ABET outcomes 'a' and 'e' as examples, this paper presents a structured approach to directly and indirectly assessing student outcomes in mathematics through a partial differential equation course and by defining appropriate measurable course goals. The strategy to assess the outcomes is also explained.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Student learning outcomes assessment: A component of program assessment
    Anderson, HM
    Moore, DL
    Anaya, G
    Bird, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (02) : 256 - 268
  • [32] Basic mathematics assessment in engineering degrees: case study
    Martin-Vaquero, Jesits
    Jose Caceres, Maria
    Rodriguez, Gerardo
    Queiniga-Dios, Araceli
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON) - EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGES OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, : 1639 - 1644
  • [33] Students as harsh critics: A comparison of student and industry assessment of placement competencies
    Nisbet, Sharen
    Haw, John
    Caldicott, Julia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORK-INTEGRATED LEARNING, 2022, 23 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [34] OPTION-SPECIFIC STUDENT OUTCOMES TO MEET BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CRITERIA
    Fox, G. A.
    Elliott, R. L.
    Bellmer, D.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2011, 27 (05) : 857 - 860
  • [35] Relationship Between Professional Competencies Required by Engineering Students According to ABET and CDIO and Teaching-Learning Techniques
    Forcael, Eric
    Garces, Gonzalo
    Orozco, Francisco
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2022, 65 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [36] Iterated assessment and feedback improves student outcomes
    Morrell, Lesley J.
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (03) : 485 - 496
  • [37] Comparing assessment methods as predictors of student learning in an undergraduate mathematics course
    Shorter, Nichole A.
    Young, Cynthia Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (08) : 1061 - 1067
  • [38] Assessment of Student Professional Outcomes for Continuous Improvement
    Keshavarz, Mohsen
    Baghdarnia, Mostafa
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DESIGN, 2013, 6 (02): : 33 - 40
  • [39] A Unified Approach for Assessing Capstone Design Projects and Student Outcomes In Computer Engineering Programs
    Yousafzai, Jibran
    Damaj, Issam
    El Abd, Mohammed
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2015, : 333 - 339
  • [40] Indirect Evaluation of Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes for Engineering Programs: A Case Study
    Ghaly, Sidi M. Ahmed
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (05) : 6209 - 6213