Using stakeholders' perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area

被引:62
作者
Francisco Carcamo, P. [1 ,2 ]
Garay-Fluehmann, Rosa [3 ]
Squeo, Francisco A. [4 ,5 ,8 ]
Gaymer, Carlos F. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Norte, Dept Biol Marina, Programa Doctorado Biol & Ecol Aplicada, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[2] Inst Foment Pesquero, Dept Medio Ambiente, Coquimbo, Chile
[3] Univ Santo Tomas, Ctr Aprendizaje, La Serena 1068, Chile
[4] Univ La Serena, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, La Serena, Chile
[5] Ctr Estudios Avanzados Zonas Aridas, La Serena, Chile
[6] Univ Catolica Norte, Dept Biol Marina, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[7] Ctr Estudios Avanzados Zonas Aridas, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[8] Inst Ecol & Biodiversidad, Santiago, Chile
[9] Millennium Nucleus Ecol & Sustainable Management, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Biodiversity; Chile; Ecosystem services; Fishermen; Multiple-Use Coastal Marine; Protected Area; Stakeholders' perceptions; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; FISHERIES; RESERVES; IMPACTS; OPPORTUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The definition of a common vision that includes social and environmental goals, ecosystem services and/or biodiversity features that people are interested in maintaining or restoring is a great challenge for marine protected areas (MPAs). Recent initiatives have promoted broadening the focus from biodiversity conservation alone to the conservation of both ecosystem services and biodiversity, indicating that this integration should improve support and compliance from stakeholders. Using a Multiple-Use Coastal Marine Protected Area recently proposed in northern Chile, we investigated (i) stakeholders' perceptions of the valuation of ecosystem services, threats to their provision, and the prioritization of ecosystem services, biodiversity features, and uses in a planning scenario, and (ii) stakeholders' expectations for the establishment of a new MPA. The perceptions of different groups of stakeholders were compared and statistically analyzed, and the relationships among prioritizations were studied using a network approach. Stakeholders identified and valued 13 ecosystem services, 28 biodiversity features, 20 uses and activities, and 22 threats. Significant differences among the valuations and prioritizations of different stakeholder groups were attributable principally to artisanal fishermen's perceptions of some components that are directly related to their activities and livelihoods. High expectations of benefits from a new MPA implementation were observed for all categories of stakeholders. To relate the different valuated components, we proposed a network-based conceptual model that reduces complexity, and also as a strategy to communicate relationships and trade-offs occurring in this particular social-ecological system to the several stakeholders. We strongly recommend early stakeholder engagement so as to understand the variability in environmental perceptions and then reflect that variation in the planning and management actions of MPAs, thus improving support for their implementation and achieving conservation and societal goals. Our findings indicate that stakeholders' perceptions and prioritizadons of ecosystem services, biodiversity features and uses should be used as the basis for starting the MPA implementation and planning process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 131
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [11] Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: Implications for the ecosystem approach
    Beaumont, N. J.
    Austen, M. C.
    Atkins, J. P.
    Burdon, D.
    Degraer, S.
    Dentinho, T. P.
    Derous, S.
    Holm, P.
    Horton, T.
    van Ierland, E.
    Marboe, A. H.
    Starkey, D. J.
    Townsend, M.
    Zarzycki, T.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2007, 54 (03) : 253 - 265
  • [12] Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: The role of valuation
    Boerger, Tobias
    Beaumont, Nicola J.
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Boyle, Kevin J.
    Cooper, Philip
    Fletcher, Stephen
    Haab, Tim
    Hanemann, Michael
    Hooper, Tara L.
    Hussain, S. Salman
    Portela, Rosimeiry
    Stithou, Mavra
    Stockill, Joanna
    Taylor, Tim
    Austen, Melanie C.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2014, 46 : 161 - 170
  • [13] AN ORDINATION OF THE UPLAND FOREST COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN
    BRAY, JR
    CURTIS, JT
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1957, 27 (04) : 326 - 349
  • [14] Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study
    Brown, GG
    Reed, P
    Harris, CC
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 22 (01) : 49 - 76
  • [15] Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services
    Busch, Malte
    La Notte, Alessandra
    Laporte, Valerie
    Erhard, Markus
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 89 - 103
  • [16] Interactions Between Spatially Explicit Conservation and Management Measures: Implications for the Governance of Marine Protected Areas
    Carcamo, P. Francisco
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (06) : 1355 - 1368
  • [17] Human dimensions of Marine Protected Areas
    Charles, Anthony
    Wilson, Lisette
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 66 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [18] Clarke K., 2001, Change in Marine Communities, V2
  • [19] Marine spatial planning in practice
    Collie, Jeremy S.
    Adamowicz, W. L.
    Beck, Michael W.
    Craig, Bethany
    Essington, Timothy E.
    Fluharty, David
    Rice, Jake
    Sanchirico, James N.
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2013, 117 : 1 - 11
  • [20] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260