Confinement effects in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions through wall-modelled large-eddy simulations

被引:109
作者
Bermejo-Moreno, Ivan [1 ]
Campo, Laura [2 ]
Larsson, Johan [1 ]
Bodart, Julien [1 ]
Helmer, David [2 ]
Eaton, John K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Turbulence Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
compressible boundary layers; shock waves; turbulent boundary layers; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; SUPERSONIC TURBULENT-FLOW; INDUCED SEPARATION; TIME ORGANIZATION; INFLOW DATA; WAVE; GENERATION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2014.505
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
We present wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (WLES) of oblique shock waves interacting with the turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) (nominal delta(99) = 5.4 mm and Re-theta approximate to 1.4 x 10(4)) developed inside a duct with an almost-square cross-section (45 mm x 47.5 mm) to investigate three-dimensional effects imposed by the lateral confinement of the flow. Three increasing strengths of the incident shock are considered, for a constant Mach number of the incoming air stream M approximate to 2, by varying the height (1.1, 3 and 5 mm) of a compression wedge located at a constant streamwise location that spans the top wall of the duct at a 20 degrees angle. Simulation results are first validated with particle image velocimetry (PIV) experimental data obtained at several vertical planes (one near the centre of the duct and three near one of the sidewalls) for the 1.1 and 3 mm-high wedge cases. The instantaneous and time-averaged structure of the flow for the stronger-interaction case (5 mm-high wedge), which shows mean flow reversal, is then investigated. Additional spanwise-periodic simulations are performed to elucidate the influence of the sidewalls, and it is found that the structure and location of the shock system, as well as the size of the separation bubble, are significantly modified by the lateral confinement. A Mach stem at the first reflected interaction is present in the simulation with sidewalls, whereas a regular shock intersection results for the spanwise-periodic case. Low-frequency unsteadiness is observed in all interactions, being stronger for the secondary shock reflections of the shock train developed inside the duct. The downstream evolution of secondary turbulent flows developed near the corners of the duct as they traverse the shock system is also studied.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 62
页数:58
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHOCK-WAVES AND BOUNDARY-LAYERS [J].
ADAMSON, TC ;
MESSITER, AF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1980, 12 :103-138
[2]  
Babinsky H., 2011, CAMBRIDGE AEROSPACE, V2011
[3]   Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations [J].
Balaras, E ;
Benocci, C ;
Piomelli, U .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (06) :1111-1119
[4]   Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness [J].
Beresh, SJ ;
Clemens, NT ;
Dolling, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (12) :2412-2422
[5]  
Bermejo-Moreno I., 2010, LES of canonical shock-turbulence interaction, P209
[6]  
Bodart J., 2012, Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs, P229
[7]   Experimental analysis of unsteady separated flows in a supersonic planar nozzle [J].
Bourgoing, A ;
Reijasse, P .
SHOCK WAVES, 2005, 14 (04) :251-258
[8]   TURBULENT SECONDARY FLOWS [J].
BRADSHAW, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1987, 19 :53-74
[9]   Corner effect and separation in transonic channel flows [J].
Bruce, P. J. K. ;
Burton, D. M. F. ;
Titchener, N. A. ;
Babinsky, H. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2011, 679 :247-262
[10]  
Cabot W., 1995, ANN RES BRIEFS, P41