Size effect in particle debonding: Comparisons between finite fracture mechanics and cohesive zone model

被引:14
|
作者
Gentieu, Timothee [1 ,2 ]
Jumel, Julien [1 ]
Catapano, Anita [3 ]
Broughton, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Cohesive zone model; finite fracture mechanics; fracture energy; interface strength; particle debonding; size effect; DAMAGE DISSIPATION; COUPLED STRESS; COMPOSITES; INTERFACE; ENERGY; TOUGHNESS; STRENGTH; MATRIX; ONSET;
D O I
10.1177/0021998318816471
中图分类号
TB33 [复合材料];
学科分类号
摘要
The present study aims at describing the debonding phenomenon of a particle embedded in an elastic matrix. Two types of fracture mechanics approaches are developed and compared in this context. The phenomenon is analytically described using a finite fracture mechanics approach, while numerical simulations are performed using a cohesive zone model to describe the decohesion process. Both methods rely on two mechanical parameters: the interface strength, sigma(max) and the fracture energy, G(c), of the interface. Both modelling approaches produce results that show larger particles tend to debond before smaller ones although noticeable differences are observed, especially concerning the relationship between the critical load and the particle radius: in the framework of the FFM, the critical load is inversely proportional to the square root of the particle radius, while when using CZM, the critical load is inversely proportional to the particle radius.
引用
收藏
页码:1941 / 1954
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fiber-size effects on the onset of fiber-matrix debonding under transverse tension: A comparison between cohesive zone and finite fracture mechanics models
    Garcia, I. G.
    Paggi, M.
    Mantic, V.
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2014, 115 : 96 - 110
  • [2] Finite Fracture Mechanics and Cohesive Crack Model: Size effects through a unified formulation
    Ferrian, Francesco
    Cornetti, Pietro
    Marsavina, Liviu
    Sapora, Alberto
    FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE-FRACTURE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, 2022, 16 (61): : 496 - 509
  • [3] Size effects on parameters of cohesive zone model in mode I fracture of limestone
    Khoramishad, H.
    Akbardoost, J.
    Ayatollahi, M. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DAMAGE MECHANICS, 2014, 23 (04) : 588 - 605
  • [4] Mode-I debonding of a double cantilever beam: A comparison between cohesive crack modeling and Finite Fracture Mechanics
    Dimitri, R.
    Cornetti, P.
    Mantic, V.
    Trullo, M.
    De Lorenzis, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 124 : 57 - 72
  • [5] Explicit modelling of meso-scale damage in laminated composites - Comparison between finite fracture mechanics and cohesive zone model
    Vereecke, Jean
    Bois, Christophe
    Wahl, Jean-Christophe
    Briand, Tanguy
    Ballere, Ludovic
    Lavelle, Florian
    COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 253
  • [6] Short cracks and V-notches: Finite Fracture Mechanics vs. Cohesive Crack Model
    Cornetti, P.
    Sapora, A.
    Carpinteri, A.
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2016, 168 : 2 - 12
  • [7] On the study of the effect of Luders plateau on fracture response with cohesive zone model
    Tu, Shengwen
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2019, 141 : 62 - 72
  • [8] Finite fracture mechanics and cohesive crack model: Weight functions vs. cohesive laws
    Cornetti, P.
    Munoz-Reja, M.
    Sapora, A.
    Carpinteri, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 156 : 126 - 136
  • [9] A multiscale cohesive zone model for rate-dependent fracture of interfaces
    Yang, Tianhao
    Liechti, Kenneth M.
    Huang, Rui
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2020, 145
  • [10] Cohesive zone model simulation of fatigue debonding along interfaces
    Moroni, F.
    Pirondi, A.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF MATERIALS (ICM11), 2011, 10 : 1829 - 1834