Image Comparative Assessment Using Iterative Reconstructions Clinical Comparison of Low-Dose Abdominal/Pelvic Computed Tomography Between Adaptive Statistical, Model-Based Iterative Reconstructions and Traditional Filtered Back Projection in 65 Patients

被引:69
作者
Vardhanabhuti, Varut [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Riordan, Richard D. [1 ]
Mitchell, Grant R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hyde, Christopher [4 ]
Roobottom, Carl A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Derriford Hosp, Dept Radiol, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Peninsula Sch Med, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[3] Univ Plymouth, Peninsula Sch Dent, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
low-dose CT abdomen; image quality; MBIR; model-based iterative reconstruction; model-based; iterative reconstruction; low-dose CT abdomen/pelvis; low-dose CT; TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; CT PROTOCOLS; RADIATION; QUALITY; REDUCTION; ALGORITHM; VOLTAGE; HYBRID; PHANTOM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to compare image quality (objective and subjective parameters) and confidence in lesion detection between 3 image reconstruction algorithms in computed tomographic (CT) examinations of the abdomen/pelvis. Materials and Methods This prospective institutional review board-approved study included 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.3 +/- 9 years; mean [SD] body mass index, 24.4 [4.8] kg) who underwent routine CT examinations of the abdomen/pelvis followed immediately by 2 low-dose scans. Raw data sets were reconstructed by using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and a model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Measurements of objective noise and CT numbers were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Six subjective image quality parameters were scored. Diagnostic confidence and accuracy in detection of various elementary lesions were performed. Results Objectively, mean image noise for MBIR was significantly superior at all dose levels (P < 0.001). Subjectively, standard-dose ASIR and low-dose MBIR scans were better than standard-dose FBP scan in all parameters assessed (P < 0.05). Low-dose MBIR scans were comparable with standard-dose ASIR scans in all parameters except at noise index of 70 (approximately 85% dose reduction), where, in this case, the detection of liver lesions less than 5 mm were rated inferior (P < 0.05) with diagnostic accuracy reducing to 77.4%. Conclusions Low-dose MBIR scan shows superior objective noise reduction compared with standard-dose FBP and ASIR. Subjectively, low-dose MBIR scans at 76% dose reduction were also superior compared with standard-dose FBP and ASIR. However, at dose reductions of 85%, small liver lesions may be missed.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience [J].
Bittencourt, Marcio Sommer ;
Schmidt, Bernhard ;
Seltmann, Martin ;
Muschiol, Gerd ;
Ropers, Dieter ;
Daniel, Werner Guenther ;
Achenbach, Stephan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2011, 27 (07) :1081-1087
[2]   Assessment of a Model-Based, Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (MBIR) Regarding Image Quality and Dose Reduction in Liver Computed Tomography [J].
Chang, Won ;
Lee, Jeong Min ;
Lee, Kyunghee ;
Yoon, Jeong Hee ;
Yu, Mi Hye ;
Han, Joon Koo ;
Choi, Byung Ihn .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (08) :598-606
[3]  
Charles M., 2007, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, V129, P500, DOI [DOI 10.1093/RPD/NCN187, 10.1093/rpd/ncn187]
[4]   Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review [J].
Chawla, Soni C. ;
Federman, Noah ;
Zhang, Di ;
Nagata, Kristen ;
Nuthakki, Soujanya ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael ;
Boechat, M. Ines .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 40 (05) :681-686
[5]   Impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Aortic Dissection Studies: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis [J].
Cornfeld, Daniel ;
Israel, Gary ;
Detroy, Ezra ;
Bokhari, Jamal ;
Mojibian, Hamid .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) :W336-W340
[6]   Multisection CT Protocols: Sex- and Age-specific Conversion Factors Used to Determine Effective Dose from Dose-Length Product [J].
Deak, Paul D. ;
Smal, Yulia ;
Kalender, Willi A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (01) :158-166
[7]   Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and a Model-based Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT: An Experimental Clinical Study [J].
Deak, Zsuzsanna ;
Grimm, Jochen M. ;
Treitl, Marcus ;
Geyer, Lucas L. ;
Linsenmaier, Ulrich ;
Koerner, Markus ;
Reiser, Maximilian F. ;
Wirth, Stefan .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) :197-206
[8]   Reducing the Radiation Dose for CT Colonography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: A Pilot Study [J].
Flicek, Kristina T. ;
Hara, Amy K. ;
Silva, Alvin C. ;
Wu, Qing ;
Peter, Mary B. ;
Johnson, C. Daniel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (01) :126-131
[9]   Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT: Feasibility Study [J].
Hara, Amy K. ;
Paden, Robert G. ;
Silva, Alvin C. ;
Kujak, Jennifer L. ;
Lawder, Holly J. ;
Pavlicek, William .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) :764-771
[10]   Individualization of Abdominopelvic CT Protocols With Lower Tube Voltage to Reduce IV Contrast Dose or Radiation Dose [J].
Hough, David M. ;
Yu, Lifeng ;
Shiung, Maria M. ;
Carter, Rickey E. ;
Geske, Jennifer R. ;
Leng, Shuai ;
Fidler, Jeff L. ;
Huprich, James E. ;
Jondal, D. Y. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
Fletcher, Joel G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (01) :147-153