Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions

被引:84
作者
Carbon, Claus-Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bamberg, Dept Gen Psychol & Methodol, Bavaria, Germany
[2] Forsch Grp EPAEG Ergon Psychol AEsthet Gestal, Bamberg, Germany
[3] Bamberg Grad Sch Affect & Cognit Sci, Bavaria, Germany
关键词
empirical aesthetics; museum context; ecological perception; artworks; aesthetic appreciation; time; Gerhard Richter; insights; incubation; viewing distance; canvas size; area size; art viewing distance accommodation; APPRECIATION; PAINTINGS; ARTWORKS; PLEASURE; STYLE;
D O I
10.1177/2041669517694184
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Aesthetics research aiming at understanding art experience is an emerging field; however, most research is conducted in labs without access to real artworks, without the social context of a museum and without the presence of other persons. The present article replicates and complements key findings of art perception in museum contexts. When observing museum visitors (N = 225; 126 female, M(age) = 43.3 years) while perceiving a series of six Gerhard Richter paintings of various sizes (0.26-3.20 sq. m) in a temporary art exhibition in January and February 2015 showing 28 paintings in total, we revealed patterns compatible to previous research. The mean time taken in viewing artworks was much longer than was mostly realized in lab contexts, here 32.9 s (Mdn = 25.4 s). We were also able to replicate visitors spending more time on viewing artworks when attending in groups of people. Additionally, we uncovered a close positive relationship (r(2) = .929) between canvas size and viewing distance, ranging on average between 1.49 and 2.12m (M = 1.72 m). We also found that more than half of the visitors returned to paintings, especially those people who had not previously paid too much attention at the initial viewing. After adding the times of returning viewers, each picture was viewed longer than had been estimated in previous research (M = 50.5 s, Mdn = 43.0 s). Results are discussed in the context of current art perception theories, focusing on the need for the ecologically valid testing of artworks in aesthetics research.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Style follows content: On the microgenesis of art perception [J].
Augustin, M. Dorothee ;
Leder, Helmut ;
Hutzler, Florian ;
Carbon, Claus-Christian .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (01) :127-138
[2]   The neural time course of art perception: An ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art [J].
Augustin, M. Dorothee ;
Defranceschi, Birgit ;
Fuchs, Helene K. ;
Carbon, Claus-Christian ;
Hutzler, Florian .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (07) :2071-2081
[3]  
Bachmann T, 1983, Arch Psychol (Frankf), V135, P149
[4]   When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits [J].
Belke, Benno ;
Leder, Helmut ;
Carbon, Claus Christian .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)
[5]   Perceptual pleasure and the brain [J].
Biederman, I ;
Vessel, EA .
AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2006, 94 (03) :247-253
[6]   The repeated evaluation technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness [J].
Carbon, CC ;
Leder, H .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) :587-601
[7]   Creating a Framework for Holistic Assessment of Aesthetics: A Response to Nilsson and Axelsson (2015) on Attributes of Aesthetic Quality of Textile Quality1 [J].
Carbon, Claus-Christian .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2016, 122 (01) :96-100
[8]   Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation [J].
Carbon, Claus-Christian .
I-PERCEPTION, 2011, 2 (07) :708-719
[9]  
Cupchik G.C., 1990, EMPIR STUD ARTS, V8, P1, DOI [DOI 10.2190/L789-TPPY-BD2Q-T7TW, 10.2190/L789-TPPY-BD2Q-T7TW]
[10]   Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality [J].
Haertel, Manuela ;
Carbon, Claus-Christian .
I-PERCEPTION, 2014, 5 (07) :602-610