Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques

被引:141
|
作者
Almeida e Silva, Junio S. [1 ,2 ]
Erdelt, Kurt [2 ]
Edelhoff, Daniel [2 ]
Araujo, Elito [3 ]
Stimmelmayr, Michael [2 ]
Cardoso Vieira, Luiz Clovis [4 ]
Gueth, Jan-Frederik [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Operat Dent, BR-75083350 Anapolis, Go, Brazil
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Comprehens Clin, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Operat Dent Div, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
CAD/CAM; Fit; Fixed dental prostheses; Zirconia; Digital impression; Precision; ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS; PROCERA ALLCERAM CROWNS; CLINICAL FIT; IN-VIVO; SYSTEMS; ACCURACY; RESTORATIONS; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-generated four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses made with digital and conventional impressions. A titanium master model was used. For group conventional impression (CI), 12 polyether impressions of the master model with Impregum(TM) were made. For group digital impression (DI), 12 digital impressions of the master model using Lava(TM) C.O.S. system were made. The replica technique was applied. The Mann-Whitney U statistical test was applied to detect statistical differences between the groups, in terms of marginal and internal fit. Face-by-face comparisons between groups were also carried out. Groups DI and CI presented mean marginal fit of 63.96 and 65.33 mu m, respectively, and showed no statistically significant difference. Groups DI and CI presented significantly different internal fit with mean values of 58.46 and 65.94 mu m, respectively. Group DI showed statistically significantly lower values for marginal and internal fit on premolar mesial face, and on molar distal and palatal faces. Frameworks fabricated from digital and conventional impressions showed clinically acceptable marginal fit. Frameworks fabricated from digital impression demonstrated better internal fit than ones fabricated from conventional impression. Reviewing each retainer face, digital impression showed better marginal and internal fit at the premolar mesial and molar distal faces. The results of this in vitro study show that digital impressions made with the Lava(TM) C.O.S. system and its digital workflow are suitable for fabricating four-unit zirconia frameworks, with regard to marginal and internal fit requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 523
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system
    Kim, Ki-Baek
    Kim, Woong-Chul
    Kim, Hae-Young
    Kim, Ji-Hwan
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2013, 29 (07) : E91 - E96
  • [42] Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hasanzade, Mahya
    Aminikhah, Mahdi
    Afrashtehfar, Kelvin I.
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (03) : 360 - 368
  • [43] Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies
    Liang, Shanshan
    Yuan, Fusong
    Li, Deli
    Jia, Lu
    Sun, Yuchun
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative in vitro study
    Ortorp, Anders
    Jonsson, David
    Mouhsen, Alaa
    von Steyern, Per Vult
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2011, 27 (04) : 356 - 363
  • [45] Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies
    Lo Russo, Lucio
    Caradonna, Giammarco
    Biancardino, Marco
    De Lillo, Alfredo
    Troiano, Giuseppe
    Guida, Laura
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (05) : 435 - 440
  • [46] Fracture resistance of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic four-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses after artificial aging
    Gungor, Merve B.
    Nemli, Secil K.
    Bal, Bilge T.
    Tamam, Even
    Yilmaz, Handan
    Aydin, Cemal
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2019, 61 (02) : 246 - 254
  • [47] Evaluation of marginal adaptation in three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and powder-free digital impression techniques
    Kocaagaoglu, Hasan
    Albayrak, Haydar
    Sahin, Sezgi Cinel
    Gurbulak, Aysegul Guleryuz
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (05) : 262 - 270
  • [48] Influence of intraoral conditions on the accuracy of digital and conventional implant impression techniques for two-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
    Ma, Yun
    Guo, Yong-qing
    Jiang, Lei
    Yu, Hao
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (04) : 633 - 640
  • [49] Fit of monolithic multilayer zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated by conventional versus digital impression: a clinical and laboratory investigations
    Morsy, Noha
    El Kateb, Mohammed
    Azer, Amir
    Fathalla, Said
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (09) : 5363 - 5373
  • [50] Comparison of Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Endocrowns at Different Depths Fabricated by the Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques
    Ardekani, Fatemeh Razavi
    Asli, Hamid Neshandar
    Musapoor, Naghme
    Falahchai, Mehran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 2024