Evaluating the legacy of an integrated conservation and development project around a tiger reserve in India

被引:27
作者
Gubbi, Sanjay [1 ,2 ]
Linkie, Matthew [2 ]
Leader-Williams, Nigel [2 ]
机构
[1] Wildlife Conservat Soc India Program, Ctr Wildlife Studies, Bengalooru 560070, India
[2] Univ Kent, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7NR, Kent, England
关键词
community benefits; direct incentives; India; integrated conservation and development projects; livelihoods; local attitudes; protected area; sustainability; wildlife conservation;
D O I
10.1017/S0376892908005225
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Independent evaluations of the impact and legacy of large donor-funded integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) are critically important but rarely undertaken. The India Eco-Development Project around Periyar Tiger Reserve (PTR-IEDP) in southern India received US$ 6.0 million, of which 43.2% was spent on community-based conservation activities. The PTR-IEDP was internally evaluated as 'successful'. Questionnaire surveys and on-site visits were used to independently evaluate its development impact and legacy, two years after the IEDP ended. Questionnaire surveys were administered to a random sample of 90 respondents from a treatment group who participated in and benefited from IEDP, and to 90 respondents from a control group who did not participate in IEDP. Among the treatment group, 71.1% of respondents were aware of IEDP's objectives, but receipt of community benefits did not influence their attitudes to conservation. Instead, their attitudes were best explained by previous experience of human-wildlife conflict, their age and their participation in an ecotourism-based profession. Furthermore, only 36.4% of the 55 community benefits sampled were still being used or maintained. Future investments in ICDPs, or any similar conservation and developmental projects need to carefully justify any of the developments they implement, and to use appropriate indicators and study design to measure project legacy.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GETTING BIODIVERSITY
  • [2] Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India
    Arjunan, M
    Holmes, C
    Puyravaud, JP
    Davidar, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (02) : 188 - 197
  • [3] Arun L. K., 2001, BIODIVERSITY CONSERV
  • [4] Brandon K, 1998, PARKS PERIL PEOPLE P
  • [5] Burnham K. P., 2002, A practical informationtheoretic approach, DOI [DOI 10.1007/B97636, 10.1007/b97636]
  • [6] Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments
    Ferraro, PJ
    Pattanayak, SK
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (04): : 482 - 488
  • [7] GHIRMIRE KB, 1997, SOCIAL CHANGE CONSER
  • [8] *GLOB ENV FAC, 2007, PROJ EX SUMM
  • [9] Human-environmental relations with tourism
    Gössling, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (02) : 539 - 556
  • [10] *GOV KER, 2004, EC REV INC POP