Improved Survival Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers

被引:116
作者
Beadle, Beth M. [1 ]
Liao, Kai-Ping [2 ]
Elting, Linda S. [2 ]
Buchholz, Thomas A. [1 ]
Ang, K. Kian [1 ]
Garden, Adam S. [1 ]
Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; OROPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; OLDER PATIENTS; COMORBIDITY; XEROSTOMIA;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28372
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a technologically advanced, and more expensive, method of delivering radiation therapy with a goal of minimizing toxicity. It has been widely adopted for head and neck cancers; however, its comparative impact on cancer control and survival remains unknown. The goal of this analysis was to compare the cause-specific survival (CSS) for patients with head and neck cancers treated with IMRT versus non-IMRT from 1999 to 2007. METHODS: CSS was determined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database and analyzed regarding treatment details, including the use of IMRT versus non-IMRT, using claims data. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by the frailty model with a propensity score matching cohort and instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3172 patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 40 months, patients treated with IMRT had a statistically significant improvement in CSS compared with those treated with non-IMRT (84.1% versus 66.0%; P<.001). When each anatomic subsite was analyzed separately, all respective subgroups of patients treated with IMRT had better CSS than those treated with non-IMRT. In multivariable survival analyses, patients treated with IMRT were associated with better CSS (HR50.72, 95% confidence interval 50.59 to 0.90 for propensity score matching; HR50.60, 95% confidence interval50.41 to 0.88 for instrumental variable analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck cancers who were treated with IMRT experienced significant improvements in CSS compared with patients treated with non-IMRT techniques. This suggests there may be benefits to IMRT in cancer outcomes, in addition to toxicity reduction, for this patient population. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 710
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional and 3D conformal radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: Is there a worthwhile quality of life gain? [J].
Tribius, Silke ;
Bergelt, Corinna .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 37 (07) :511-519
[32]  
Warren JL, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P3
[33]   Cost-effectiveness of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Oropharyngeal Cancer [J].
Yong, J. H. E. ;
Beca, J. ;
O'Sullivan, B. ;
Huang, S. H. ;
McGowan, T. ;
Warde, P. ;
Hoch, J. S. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (07) :532-538
[34]   Patterns of Care and Outcomes Associated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Older Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer [J].
Yu, James B. ;
Soulos, Pamela R. ;
Sharma, Richa ;
Makarov, Danil V. ;
Decker, Roy H. ;
Smith, Benjamin D. ;
Desai, Rani A. ;
Cramer, Laura D. ;
Gross, Cary P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01) :E101-E107