Functional and survival outcomes in elderly patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery

被引:7
作者
Philips, Ramez [1 ]
Topf, Michael C. [2 ]
Crawley, Meghan B. [3 ]
Swendseid, Brian [1 ]
Luginbuhl, Adam [1 ]
Curry, Joseph [1 ]
Cognetti, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 6th Floor,925 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 1215 21st Ave S Suite 7209, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Head & Neck Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave A71, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Transoral robotic surgery; Head and neck cancer; Elderly; Age; Survival; Functional status; Enteric feed dependence; Squamous cell carcinoma; Human papillomavirus; Non-elderly; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; RADIATION-THERAPY; HEAD; INTENSITY; DYSPHAGIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104954
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine if elderly patients (>= 70 years) have differences in functional and survival outcomes compared to non-elderly patients (< 70 years) following transoral robotic surgery. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing robotic surgery for head and neck cancer at a tertiary institution from 2011 to 2016. Functional status was evaluated with diet, enteric feeding status, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), tracheostomy tube placement, and unplanned readmission. Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between elderly and non-elderly patients. Results: Two hundred and forty-six patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 63.5 +/- 9.74 years. There were 64 patients (26.0%) that were >= 70 years. Elderly patients were more likely to be discharged with enteric access (p < 0.002). As early as 3 months, there was no significant difference in need for enteric feeds, diet, or FOIS score. There was no difference in tracheostomy tube rates and unplanned readmission between both cohorts. There was no significant difference in OS and DFS between age groups when stratified by p16 status. Conclusions: Elderly patients are more likely to require perioperative enteric feeding, but 3-month, 1-year, and 2 year functional outcomes are comparable to younger patients. Survival outcomes are similar in both populations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complications of Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Sethi, Rosh K. V.
    Chen, Michelle M.
    Malloy, Kelly M.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 53 (06) : 1109 - +
  • [22] Functional and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery for Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
    Durmus, Kasim
    Patwa, Hafiz S.
    Gokozan, Hamza N.
    Kucur, Cuneyt
    Teknos, Theodoros N.
    Agrawal, Amit
    Old, Matthew O.
    Ozer, Enver
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (09) : 2089 - 2095
  • [23] De-Escalated Adjuvant Therapy After Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: The Sinai Robotic Surgery (SIRS) Trial
    Miles, Brett A.
    Posner, Marshall R.
    Gupta, Vishal
    Teng, Marita S.
    Bakst, Richard L.
    Yao, Mike
    Misiukiewicz, Kryzsztof J.
    Chai, Raymond L.
    Sharma, Sonam
    Westra, William H.
    Kim-Schulze, Seunghee
    Dayal, Bheesham
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Sikora, Andrew G.
    Som, Peter M.
    Genden, Eric M.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (06) : 504 - 513
  • [24] Transoral robotic surgery in HPV plus oropharyngeal cancer of unknown primary
    Roman, Kelsey M.
    Nguyen, Cecilia
    Torabi, Sina J.
    Berger, Michael H.
    Kuan, Edward C.
    Tjoa, Tjoson
    Haidar, Yarah M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 45 (01)
  • [25] Outcomes in surgically resectable oropharynx cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery versus definitive chemoradiation
    Dhanireddy, Bhaswanth
    Burnett, Nicolas P.
    Sanampudi, Sreeja
    Wooten, Charles E.
    Slezak, Jon
    Shelton, Brent
    Shelton, Lauren
    Shearer, Andrew
    Arnold, Susanne
    Kudrimoti, Mahesh
    Gal, Thomas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 40 (05) : 673 - 677
  • [26] One-year outcomes for da Vinci single port robot for transoral robotic surgery
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Yin, Linda X.
    Price, Daniel L.
    Janus, Jeffery R.
    Kasperbauer, Jan L.
    Moore, Eric J.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2020, 42 (08): : 2077 - 2087
  • [27] Transoral robotic surgery: The radiation oncologist's perspective
    Ward, Matthew C.
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 60 : 96 - 102
  • [28] Quality of life and functional evaluation in patients with tongue base tumors treated exclusively with transoral robotic surgery: A 1-year follow-up study
    Mercante, Giuseppe
    Masiello, Alessandra
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Cristalli, Giovanni
    Pellini, Raul
    Spriano, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (08) : 1561 - 1566
  • [29] Transoral Robotic Surgery and Human Papillomavirus Infection: Impact on Oropharyngeal Cancer Prognosis
    Chen, Jingtao
    Zhang, Xing
    Yan, Shida
    Li, Xiyuan
    Li, Menghua
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhang, Shiting
    Li, Fengjiao
    Song, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
  • [30] Quality of life after radiation and transoral robotic surgery in advanced oropharyngeal cancer
    Kaffenberger, Thomas M.
    Patel, Ankur K.
    Lyu, Lingyun
    Li, Jinhong
    Wasserman-Wincko, Tamara
    Zandberg, Dan P.
    Clump, David A.
    Johnson, Jonas T.
    Nilsen, Marci L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05): : 983 - 990