Needlestick injuries in health care workers: analysis of non preventable risk factors through standard precautions

被引：4

作者：

Campins, Magda ^{[2
]}

Torres, Miquel ^{[1
]}

Varela, Pilar ^{[3
,4
]}

Clemente, Victoria Lopez ^{[3
]}

Gasco, Ampar ^{[5
,6
]}

de la Prada, Miriam ^{[4
]}

Espuga, Meritxell ^{[5
]}

Tapias, Gemma ^{[4
,7
]}

Pena, Pilar ^{[3
]}

Hermosilla, Eduardo ^{[2
]}

Otero, Susana ^{[2
]}

Bastida, Teresa ^{[8
]}

Sanz, Pilar ^{[4
]}

Bayas, Jose Maria ^{[9
]}

Serra, Consol ^{[10
,11
]}

机构：

[1] Fundaco Hosp Esperit Sant, Med Interna Serv, Barcelona, Spain

[2] Hosp Univ Vall Hebron, Serv Med Prevent & Epidemiol, Barcelona, Spain

[3] Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Serv Prevenc, Barcelona, Spain

[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Prevenc, Barcelona, Spain

[5] Hosp Univ Vall Hebron, Unidad Prevenc Riesgos Laborales, Barcelona, Spain

[6] Hosp Viladecans, Unidad Prevenc Riesgos Laborales, Barcelona, Spain

[7] Hosp Mataro, Serv Prevenc Consorci Sanitari Maresme, Barcelona, Spain

[8] Fundacio Hosp Esperit Sant, Lab Microbiol, Barcelona, Spain

[9] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Ctr Vacunac Adultos, Barcelona, Spain

[10] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Unidad Recerca Salud Laboral, Barcelona, Spain

[11] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ, Barcelona, Spain

来源：

MEDICINA CLINICA | 2009年 / 132卷 / 07期

关键词：

Needlestick injuries; Risk factors; Standard precautions; Health care workers; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES; JOB STRAIN; BLOOD; INFECTION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.medcli.2008.06.016

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Objective: To identify potential risk factors of occupational needlestick injuries that were not prevented despite adherence to standard precautions. Patients and method: Multicentre case control study. Cases were defined as any workers who reported a needlestick injury despite documented use of standard precautions. Controls were workers of the same hospital who had performed procedures similar to matched cases and who reported a needlestick injury without correct use of standard precautions (control 1) or who did not report a needlestick injury during the previous 6 months (control 2). Results: A total of 512 injuries were included (256 cases and 256 controls I), and 256 controls 2. Analyses based on controls I showed an increased risk for physicians (ORa 2.22: 95% CI: 1.07-4.60) and those working in the operating theatre (ORa 2.87; 95% CI: 1.26-6.55). Regarding controls 2, increased risks were found for those younger than 25 years (ORa 2.58; 95% CI: 1.20-5.58), physicians (ORa 5.24; 95% CI: 1.5018.28), those working in operating theatres (ORa 6.00: 95% CI 2.07-17.36), emergency services, intensive and life-support units (ORa 3.48; 95% CI: 1.37-8.85) and those exposed to poor lighting (ORa 1.67; 95% CI: 1.02-2.82). Education in occupational risk prevention was found to be a protecting factor when controls I were analyzed (ORa 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.97). Conclusions: Despite adherence to standard precautions, working as a physician, in operating theatres, emergency and life-support units, being younger than 25 years, and being exposed to poor visibility and training in occupational risk prevention appear to be independent risk factors for occupational needlestick injuries. (c) 2008 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：251 / 258

页数：8