HER2 status in lung adenocarcinoma: A comparison of immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), dual-ISH, and gene mutations

被引:70
|
作者
Yoshizawa, Akihiko [1 ,2 ]
Sumiyoshi, Shinji [2 ]
Sonobe, Makoto [3 ]
Kobayashi, Masashi [3 ]
Uehara, Takeshi [1 ]
Fujimoto, Masakazu [2 ]
Tsuruyama, Tatsuaki [2 ]
Date, Hiroshi [3 ]
Haga, Hironori [2 ]
机构
[1] Shinshu Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Matsumoto, Nagano 3908621, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Kyoto 606, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Kyoto 606, Japan
关键词
Lung adenocarcinoma; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Immunohistochemistry; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Dual in situ hybridization; Trastuzumab; PHASE-II TRIAL; COPY NUMBER; BREAST-CANCER; TRASTUZUMAB; GEFITINIB; OVEREXPRESSION; AMPLIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.06.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: While novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) agents have recently been developed, no definite criteria have been proposed as indications for the use of these agents in patients with lung cancer. Here, we tested HER2 alterations by using four methods and explored the concordance of these methods to improve our understanding of the accuracy of HER2 testing methods. Materials and methods: We analyzed HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual in situ hybridization (DISH) by using a tissue microarray comprising lung adenocarcinoma specimens from 243 consecutive patients. The presence of mutations in the EGFR, KRAS, and HER2 genes were also determined. Results: Positive IHC (score 3+) was observed in six cases (2.5%). Amplification of HER2 was observed in five cases (2.1%) by FISH and in nine cases (3.7%) by DISH. HER2 expression by IHC and gene amplification by FISH were significantly associated (P < 0.001). The overall concordance between FISH and DISH by amplification status was 96.7% (P < 0.001). One hundred nine tumors (49.9%) had EGFR mutations, 25 (11.2%) had KRAS mutations, and six (2.7%) had HER2 mutations. All of these mutations were mutually exclusive. Cases having HER2 mutations were positively correlated with cases having HER2 amplification (P < 0.001). Two of six cases with HER2 mutations showed amplifications by FISH and DISH tests. Conclusion: HER2 protein overexpression, gene amplification, and gene mutations appeared to be uncommon in lung adenocarcinoma. Cases with HER2 mutations tended to show HER2 gene amplification. The results indicated that HER2 gene amplification and mutations should be tested to determine whether patients are eligible for administration of new anti-HER2 agents. In addition, DISH was better than FISH for detection of cases with HER2 amplification. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Dual-ISH (DISH) in the Determination of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer
    Mansfield, Aaron S.
    Sukov, William R.
    Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E.
    Sakai, Yuta
    Walsh, Frank J.
    Lonzo, Melissa
    Wiktor, Anne E.
    Dogan, Ahmet
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 139 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [2] Comparison of Dual-ISH (DISH) With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Correlation With Immunohistochemical Findings for HER2/Neu Status in Breast Carcinoma
    Layfield, Lester J.
    Wallander, Michelle L.
    Tripp, Sheryl R.
    Redpath, Stella
    Banks, Peter M.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2017, 25 (04) : 231 - 236
  • [3] HER2 In Situ Hybridization in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Comparison of Automated Dual ISH to FISH
    Grin, Andrea
    Brezden-Masley, Christine
    Bauer, Sharon
    Streutker, Catherine J.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2013, 21 (06) : 561 - 566
  • [4] In situ analysis of HER2 mRNA in gastric carcinoma: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization, dual-color silver in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry
    Kim, Min A.
    Jung, Jung Eun
    Lee, Hee Eun
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    Kim, Woo Ho
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [5] Comparison of HER2 status determination methods in HER2 (2+) patients: Manual fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) vs. dual silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH)
    Pehlivanoglu, Burcin
    Serin, Gurdeniz
    Yeniay, Levent
    Zekioglu, Osman
    Gokmen, Erhan
    Ozdemir, Necmettin
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2017, 31 : 36 - 40
  • [6] Concordance of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer patients in Xinjiang autonomous region, China
    Zhao, Bing
    Wang, Yu
    Xu, Hang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 10 (10): : 10459 - 10466
  • [7] Analysis of HER2 status in breast carcinoma by fully automated HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): comparison of two immunohistochemical tests and manual FISH
    Yoon, Nara
    Do, In-Gu
    Cho, Eun Yoon
    APMIS, 2014, 122 (09) : 755 - 760
  • [8] Concordance analysis between HER2 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in non-small cell lung cancer
    Ko, Young San
    Kim, Nae Yu
    Pyo, Jung-Soo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2018, 33 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [9] Feline HER2 Protein Expression Levels and Gene Status in Feline Mammary Carcinoma: Optimization of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and In Situ Hybridization (ISH) Techniques
    Soares, Maria
    Correia, Jorge
    Rodrigues, Pedro
    Simoes, Margarida
    de Matos, Alves
    Ferreira, Fernando
    MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2013, 19 (04) : 876 - 882
  • [10] Her2 Amplification Status in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH)
    Ghaffari, Saeed Reza
    Sabokbar, Tayebeh
    Dastan, Jila
    Rafati, Maryam
    Moossavi, Shirin
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (04) : 1031 - 1034