Unorthodox Uses of Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Method

被引:38
作者
Koenig, Gerhard [1 ]
Bruckner, Stefan [1 ]
Boresch, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Computat Biol Chem, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
free energy stimulation; acceptance ratio method; force field; implicit solvent; FREE-ENERGY SIMULATIONS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1002/jcc.21255
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We illustrate the application of Bennett's acceptance ratio method (BAR) to problems in which standard methods to compute free energy differences (thermodynamic integration, exponential formula) are not practical. Our starting point is the observation that BAR can often compute the free energy difference between two states without the need for intermediate states usually employed (and necessary) in alchemical free energy simulations. This is demonstrated first for the free energy difference between ethane and methanol in aqueous solution. We then show how BAR can be used to compute directly rather unusual free energy differences, such as the free energy difference resulting from changing the treatment of electrostatic interactions, from switching the force field, or from using an implicit solvent model. Calculations of this kind should prove useful for force field development and the validation of implicit solvent methods. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals. Inc. J Comput Chem 30: 1712-1718, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:1712 / 1718
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF FREE-ENERGY DIFFERENCES FROM MONTE-CARLO DATA [J].
BENNETT, CH .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (02) :245-268
[2]   Unexpected relative aqueous solubilities of a phosphotyrosine analogue and two phosphonate derivatives [J].
Boresch, S ;
Leitgeb, M ;
Beselman, A ;
MacKerell, AD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 127 (13) :4640-4648
[3]   The role of bonded terms in free energy simulations. 2. Calculation of their influence on free energy differences of solvation [J].
Boresch, S ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1999, 103 (01) :119-136
[4]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[5]   Solvation free energy of amino acids and side-chain analogues [J].
Chang, Jaeeon ;
Lenhoff, Abraham M. ;
Sandler, Stanley I. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2007, 111 (08) :2098-2106
[6]   A 2ND GENERATION FORCE-FIELD FOR THE SIMULATION OF PROTEINS, NUCLEIC-ACIDS, AND ORGANIC-MOLECULES [J].
CORNELL, WD ;
CIEPLAK, P ;
BAYLY, CI ;
GOULD, IR ;
MERZ, KM ;
FERGUSON, DM ;
SPELLMEYER, DC ;
FOX, T ;
CALDWELL, JW ;
KOLLMAN, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 117 (19) :5179-5197
[7]   Path-ensemble averages in systems driven far from equilibrium [J].
Crooks, GE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 61 (03) :2361-2366
[8]   A SMOOTH PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD [J].
ESSMANN, U ;
PERERA, L ;
BERKOWITZ, ML ;
DARDEN, T ;
LEE, H ;
PEDERSEN, LG .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 103 (19) :8577-8593
[9]   ON THE USE OF ACCEPTANCE RATIO METHODS IN FREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS [J].
FERGUSON, DM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 99 (12) :10086-10087
[10]   FACTS:: Fast analytical continuum treatment of solvation [J].
Haberthuer, Urs ;
Caflisch, Amedeo .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 29 (05) :701-715