WHEN THE LIMITED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS CAN BE JUSTIFIED?

被引:0
作者
Molchanov, R. M. [1 ]
Stakhovskyi, E. O. [2 ]
Kriachkova, L., V [1 ]
Pilin, Ye, V [1 ]
Malinovskyi, S. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] SE Dnipropetrovsk Med Acad Hlth, Minist Ukraine, V Vernadsky Str 9, UA-49044 Dnipro, Ukraine
[2] Natl Canc Inst, M Lomonosova Str 33-43, UA-03022 Kiev, Ukraine
来源
MEDICNI PERSPEKTIVI | 2020年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
radical prostatectomy; pelvic lymph node dissection; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.26641/2307-0404.2020.3.214848
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important diagnostic step in the surgical treatment of moderate and high risk prostate cancer (PCa) according to D'Amico criteria. However, it has a number of complications and prolonged time of surgery. Limited PLND has a more favorable complication profile, but is not used because of its low diagnostic efficacy in low-risk RP patients, while in higher-risk groups its relevance remains controversial. The goal - to determine the diagnostic efficacy of limited PLND in radical prostatectomy in patients of moderate and high risk. A retrospective analysis included 377 PCa patients in whom the radical prostatectomy with PLND was performed in the period between 2013 and 2016. Patients' age was 63.4 +/- 6.2 y.o. 40 (10.6%) patients had low, 126 (33.4%) - moderate and 211 (56.0%) - high risk PCa. No statistically significant differences in the number of complications of PLND in open and laparoscopic surgery (p=0.16) were found. The overall frequency of complications was 22.8% (95% CI 18.6-27.1). When comparing clinical and histological parameters in groups with and without metastases, statistically significant differences were found between the levels of total prostate specific antigen before surgery (p=0.010); the Gleason score (corresponding median values of 8.0 (8.0; 9.0) and 7.0 (6.0; 7.0); p<0.001) and local tumor status (T)-the patients with stage >T2 53.1% and 19.4%, respectively (p<0.001). In 32 (8.5%) patients metastatic lesions of lymphatic nodes were found. Of these, 28 (87.5%) were related to high-risk, 4 (12.5%)-to moderate-risk. The main prognostic criteria for lymph node metastasis are preoperative PSA level, the Gleason Score, and T-status of the tumor. According to ROC analysis, the diagnostic efficacy of limited PLND increases in patients at high and moderate risk at a total PSA level greater than 18.4 ng/ml. This can be used to justify the indications for limited PLND in patients in these groups to reduce the number of postoperative complications associated with extended procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 131
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Banapour Pooya, 2019, Perm J, V23, DOI 10.7812/TPP/17-233
[2]   Predictive factors for lymph node positivity in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Batra, Vikram ;
Gautam, Gagan ;
Jaipuria, Jiten ;
Suryavanshi, Manav ;
Khera, Rakesh ;
Ahlawat, Rajesh .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 31 (03) :217-222
[3]   Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Da Pozzo, Luigi Filippo ;
Roscigno, Marco ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) :1006-1013
[4]   Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Chalouhy, Charbel ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Ghavamian, Reza .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (03) :219-226
[5]   Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cimino, Sebastiano ;
Reale, Giulio ;
Castelli, Tommaso ;
Favilla, Vincenzo ;
Giardina, Raimondo ;
Russo, Giorgio Ivan ;
Privitera, Salvatore ;
Morgia, Giuseppe .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (05) :345-350
[6]   The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Fossati, Nicola ;
Willemse, Peter-Paul M. ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Yuan, Cathy Yuhong ;
Briers, Erik ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Cornford, Philip ;
De Santis, Maria ;
MacPepple, Ekelechi ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Matveev, Vsevolod B. ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Joniau, Steven .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) :84-109
[7]  
Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [10.3322/caac.20115, 10.3322/caac.20107, 10.3322/caac.21492]
[8]  
Lang TA, 2006, REPORT STAT MED ANNO, V2nd, DOI [10.2307/2669655, DOI 10.2307/2669655]
[9]   Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification [J].
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi ;
Budaeus, Lars ;
Zaffuto, Emanuele ;
Pompe, Raisa S. ;
Bandini, Marco ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Schiffmann, Jonas ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Chun, Felix ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (02) :81.e17-81.e24
[10]  
Mottet N, 2019, EAU EANM ESTRO ESUR, DOI [10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.014, DOI 10.1016/J.EURURO.2019.07.014]