Input-output and life-cycle emissions accounting: applications in the real world

被引:22
作者
Kokoni, Sophia [1 ]
Skea, Jim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Environm Policy, London SW7 1NA, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
embodied carbon; energy policy; trade policy; tax/taxation; emissions accounting; public policy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; INVENTORY ANALYSIS; BORDER MEASURES; ELECTRIC-POWER; NUCLEAR-POWER; CO2; EMISSIONS; CARBON; RESPONSIBILITY; UK;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2014.864190
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A considerable body of academic literature has emerged that addresses methods for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as opposed to the territorial approach used under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The consumption-based approach attributes emissions to consumers of final goods and services by accounting for the GHG emissions 'embedded' in raw materials and intermediate goods and services. Many authors have advocated the wider adoption of a consumption-based approach. This article does not take one side or another in the consumption-based versus territorial debate. Instead, it explores the extent to which consumption-based thinking has already found practical application by companies and public authorities and assesses the potential for further adoption. The methodologies underlying consumption-based approaches are critically reviewed to note criteria such as accuracy and the timeliness of data generation, which suggest the potential for practical application. A typology of applications is then developed and each category of application is systematically explored citing real-world examples where possible. The article concludes with a discussion of the potential for the wider application of consumption-based approaches and identifies further research needs.Policy relevanceConsumption-based approaches to accounting for GHG emissions are gradually being adopted in the policy domain, albeit in a haphazard way. This article (1) identifies the strengths and weaknesses associated with top-down input-output approaches and bottom-up life cycle assessment approaches to consumption-based accounting in terms of criteria such as accuracy and timeliness of data generation; (2) provides a comprehensive review of actual and proposed applications to date; (3) constructs a taxonomy of applications drawing on the analysis of strengths and weaknesses; and (4) considers the prospects for further application. The article will help policy makers and policy analysts to assess the feasibility and desirability of future applications of consumption-based approaches and address implementation barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 396
页数:25
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INPUT OUTPUT FDN EXT
[2]   Understanding Changes in the UK's CO2 Emissions: A Global Perspective [J].
Baiocchi, Giovanni ;
Minx, Jan C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (04) :1177-1184
[3]  
Barnaby Frank., 2007, Too Hot to Handle? the Future of Civil Nuclear Power
[4]   Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study [J].
Barrett, John ;
Peters, Glen ;
Wiedmann, Thomas ;
Scott, Kate ;
Lenzen, Manfred ;
Roelich, Katy ;
Le Quere, Corinne .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (04) :451-470
[5]   Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study [J].
Barrett, John ;
Scott, Kate .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (01) :299-307
[6]   The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Bastianoni, S ;
Pulselli, FM ;
Tiezzi, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (03) :253-257
[7]  
Bhatia Pankaj., 2011, Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Product Life Cycle Accounting and reporting Standard
[8]  
Bowyer C., 2012, The GHG emissions intensity of bioenergy: Does bioenergy have a role to play in reducing GHG emissions of Europe's economy?
[9]  
Committee on Climate Change, 2013, RED UKS CARB FOOTPR
[10]   Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method [J].
Crawford, Robert H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :496-506