Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Li, Meng [1 ]
Hu, Mengyang [1 ]
Wang, Yuanjian [2 ]
Yang, Xingsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 107 West Wenhua Rd, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Huaxi Clin Med Coll, Jiangan Campus, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; Radiotherapy; Intermediate-risk factors; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL SURGERY; STAGE-IB; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CARCINOMA; HYSTERECTOMY; CISPLATIN; IMPACT; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: At present, extensive hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection are preferred for early-stage cervical cancer. However, additional adjuvant therapy could be considered if there is a risk for recurrence. Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy are recommended for patients with high risk factors. The treatment regimen for patients with intermediate-risk factors, however, remains unclear. We, thus, performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), grade III/IV hematologic toxicity and grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) groups. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to identify relevant studies published before November 30, 2018 to compare CRT with RT as a postoperative adjuvant therapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors. We used Stata (version 14.0) to calculate odds risks (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled data was assessed by the fixed-effects model. Results: Of the 428 identified studies, only 9 were eligible and included in our analysis (CRT: n = 870: RT: n = 932). CRT significantly prolonged RFS (OR = 3.43, 95% CI 2.08-5.67, P = 0.000) and OS (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.30-2.50, P = 0.000). The occurrence rate of grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (OR = 16.07, 95% CI 6.47-39.93, P = 0.000) was significantly higher in CRT, while grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity was ambiguous for CRT and RT with an OR of 1.91 (95% CI 0.95-3.83, P = 0.069). Conclusions: For early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors, CRT can dramatically improve RFS and OS compared with RT. Apart from the increase in grade III/IV hematologic toxicity, CRT was well tolerated and accepted treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASIAN PAC J CANC PRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[3]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[4]   DETERMINANTS OF INCREASED RISK FOR RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR STAGE-IB AND STAGE-IIA CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
FULLER, AF ;
ELLIOTT, N ;
KOSLOFF, C ;
HOSKINS, WJ ;
LEWIS, JL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 33 (01) :34-39
[5]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[6]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[7]   Comparison of chemoradiation with radiation as postoperative adjuvant therapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors [J].
Kim, K. ;
Kang, S. B. ;
Chung, H. H. ;
Kim, J. W. ;
Park, N. H. ;
Song, Y. S. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (02) :192-196
[8]   VALUE OF ADJUVANT WHOLE-PELVIS IRRADIATION AFTER WERTHEIM HYSTERECTOMY FOR EARLY-STAGE SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX WITH PELVIC NODAL METASTASIS - A MATCHED-CONTROL STUDY [J].
KINNEY, WK ;
ALVAREZ, RD ;
REID, GC ;
SCHRAY, MF ;
SOONG, SJ ;
MORLEY, GW ;
PODRATZ, KC ;
SHINGLETON, HM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 34 (03) :258-262
[9]   Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019 [J].
Koh, Wui-Jin ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. ;
Bean, Sarah ;
Bradley, Kristin ;
Campos, Susana M. ;
Cho, Kathleen R. ;
Chon, Hye Sook ;
Chu, Christina ;
Clark, Rachel ;
Cohn, David ;
Crispens, Marta Ann ;
Damast, Shari ;
Dorigo, Oliver ;
Eifel, Patricia J. ;
Fisher, Christine M. ;
Frederick, Peter ;
Gaffney, David K. ;
Han, Ernest ;
Huh, Warner K. ;
Lurain, John R., III ;
Mariani, Andrea ;
Mutch, David ;
Nagel, Christa ;
Nekhlyudov, Larissa ;
Fader, Amanda Nickles ;
Remmenga, Steven W. ;
Reynolds, R. Kevin ;
Tillmanns, Todd ;
Ueda, Stefanie ;
Wyse, Emily ;
Yashar, Catheryn M. ;
McMillian, Nicole R. ;
Scavone, Jillian L. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (01) :64-84
[10]   Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study [J].
Landy, Rebecca ;
Pesola, Francesca ;
Castanon, Alejandra ;
Sasieni, Peter .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (09) :1140-1146