Recognizing and reporting domestic violence: attitudes, experiences and behavior of Dutch dentists

被引:17
作者
van Dam, Brigitte A. F. M. [1 ]
van der Sanden, Wil J. M. [2 ]
Bruers, Josef J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Dutch Dent Assoc KNMT, Dept Res & Informat, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Coll Oral Sci, Dept Qual & Safety Oral Hlth Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
GDP; Domestic violence; Mandatory reporting code; Attitudes; Behaviors; Knowledge; Education; CHILD-ABUSE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-015-0141-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: On July 1st 2013 the Mandatory Reporting Code Act came into force in the Netherlands, making it compulsory for health professionals to adhere to a reporting code when they suspect patients to be victims of domestic violence (DV) or child abuse (CA). The Royal Dutch Dental Association (KNMT) developed a reporting code for dental professionals (RCD). Moreover, an e-learning module about DV has been developed. A web-survey was conducted to investigate how general dental practitioners (GDPs) deal with the RCD and what their experiences are with (signs of) DV and CA. Methods: In April 2014 1038 GDPs were invited by e-mail to participate in a web-survey consisting of 24 items, through the KNMT Data Stations Project. The data was analyzed using SPSS (RELIABILITY, CHISQ and ANOVA). Results: Of all GDPs invited to participate 264 (25 %) responded. 82 % of these GDPs are aware of their obligation to use the reporting code. 54 % of the GDPs are in favor of this obligation. 76 % of the GDPs have taken notice of the KNMT's RCD and 51 % of the GDPs have implemented the reporting code in one form or another in their practice. 24 % of the GDPs stated having suspected DV during the last twelve months in the case of 2.4 patients on average. 81 % took note of this in the patient's record and 58 % also took action in different ways. 54 % wants to complete the e-learning module. Conclusions: Most GDPs are aware of the new legislation and have taken cognizance of the RCD. Even though the majority of GDPs are not opposed to using a reporting code, over half of them have not yet implemented the code in practice. An important factor in this regard seems to be that a substantial minority of the GDPs says they are not sufficiently informed about aspects of reporting a case and about the steps they have to take.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CHILD MALTREATMENT
[2]  
Barbara Aved Associates, 2006, CHALL DENT PROF REC
[3]  
Berg-le Clercq T., 2012, COMBATING CHILD ABUS
[4]  
Bruers J J M, 2014, Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd, V121, P345
[5]   The dental practitioner and child protection in Scotland [J].
Cairns, AM ;
Mok, JYQ ;
Welbury, RR .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2005, 199 (08) :517-520
[6]   The role of the dental team in responding to domestic violence [J].
Coulthard, P. ;
Warburton, A. L. .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2007, 203 (11) :645-648
[7]   Child abuse and the otolaryngologist: Part I [J].
Crouse, CD ;
Faust, RA .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 128 (03) :305-310
[8]  
da Silva Rubenice Amaral, 2014, General Dentistry, V62, P62
[9]   The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women [J].
Devries, K. M. ;
Mak, J. Y. T. ;
Garcia-Moreno, C. ;
Petzold, M. ;
Child, J. C. ;
Falder, G. ;
Lim, S. ;
Bacchus, L. J. ;
Engell, R. E. ;
Rosenfeld, L. ;
Pallitto, C. ;
Vos, T. ;
Abrahams, N. ;
Watts, C. H. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 340 (6140) :1527-1528
[10]  
Dutch Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), 2013, INV MELDC HUIS GEW K