Key Considerations for the Use of Nature-Based Solutions in Climate Services and Adaptation

被引:6
作者
Pathak, Arsum [1 ]
Hilberg, Laura E. [2 ]
Hansen, Lara J. [2 ]
Stein, Bruce A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Wildlife Federat, Austin, TX 78752 USA
[2] EcoAdapt, Bainbridge Isl, WA 98110 USA
[3] Natl Wildlife Federat, Washington, DC 20006 USA
关键词
climate services; nature-based solutions; vulnerability assessment; climate adaptation; resilience; co-production; URBANIZATION; ECOSYSTEMS; RESPONSES; WETLANDS; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.3390/su142416817
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature-based solutions (NbS) involve the reliance on natural or nature-based systems to enhance community resilience through delivering both climate adaptation and mitigation outcomes. While NbS do not necessarily represent new "technology" or methods, the intentional incorporation of these approaches into climate adaptation and mitigation efforts is often considered novel, particularly within the climate services sector where interventions have historically prioritized structural infrastructure approaches. NbS can offer an effective replacement for or complement to such traditional infrastructure approaches. Additionally, natural and nature-based systems can respond to climate change in a manner that engineered solutions often cannot, providing long-term holistic adaptation and mitigation success with additional benefits to ecosystem services such as improved air and water quality, carbon sequestration, outdoor recreation, and biodiversity protection. The incorporation of NbS as a core component of climate services increases the likelihood of adoption and effective implementation, ensuring greater long-term effectiveness for both communities and the natural systems on which they depend. This article supports the adoption and effective implementation of NbS by climate service providers through presenting a set of seven "key considerations" for their use in community-based adaptation. These key considerations are based on a review of work in the field to date, both within the United States and globally. Although these key considerations were developed in support of US adaptation planning applications (specifically, the US Climate Resilience Toolkit), they have global relevance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species Version 2020-1, DOI 10.1163/ej.9789004163300.i-1081.832
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, COASTAL WETLANDS FLO
[4]   Climate-change adaptation on rangelands: linking regional exposure with diverse adaptive capacity [J].
Briske, David D. ;
Joyce, Linda A. ;
Polley, H. Wayne ;
Brown, Joel R. ;
Wolter, Klaus ;
Morgan, Jack A. ;
McCarl, Bruce A. ;
Bailey, Derek W. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 13 (05) :249-256
[5]  
Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges, DOI DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN
[6]   Adaptation services of floodplains and wetlands under transformational climate change [J].
Colloff, Matthew J. ;
Lavorel, Sandra ;
Wise, Russell M. ;
Dunlop, Michael ;
Overton, Ian C. ;
Williams, Kristen J. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (04) :1003-1017
[7]  
Dahl T. A., 2017, ERDC/CHL CHETN-VII-17
[8]  
Daz S., 2019, SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6417333, 10.1111/padr.12283]
[9]  
Depietri Y, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_6
[10]   Racial Inequities in the Federal Buyout of Flood-Prone Homes: A Nationwide Assessment of Environmental Adaptation [J].
Elliott, James R. ;
Brown, Phylicia Lee ;
Loughran, Kevin .
SOCIUS, 2020, 6