A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging

被引:772
作者
Hengl, T
Heuvelink, GBM
Stein, A
机构
[1] Int Inst Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AA Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Lab Soil Sci & Geol, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
spatial prediction; logit transformation; factor analysis; visualisation; environmental correlation;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.018
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A methodological framework for spatial prediction based on regression-kriging is described and compared with ordinary kriging and plain regression. The data are first transformed using logit transformation for target variables and factor analysis for continuous predictors (auxiliary maps). The target variables are then fitted using step-wise regression and residuals interpolated using kriging. A generic visualisation method is used to simultaneously display predictions and associated uncertainty. The framework N as tested using 135 profile observations from the national survey in Croatia, divided into interpolation (100) and validation sets (35). Three target variables: organic matter, pH in topsoil and topsoil thickness were predicted from six relief parameters and nine soil mapping units. Prediction efficiency was evaluated using the mean error and root mean square error (RMSE) of prediction at validation points. The results show that the proposed framework improves efficiency of predictions. Moreover. it ensured normality of residuals and enforced prediction values to be within the physical range of a variable. For organic matter, it achieved lower relative RMSE than ordinary kriging (53.3% versus 66.5%). For topsoil thickness, it achieved a lower relative RMSE (66.5% versus 83.3%) and a lower bias than ordinary kriging (0.15 versus 0.69 cm). The prediction of pH in topsoil was difficult with all three methods. This framework can adopt both continuous and categorical soil variables in a semi-automated or automated manner. It opens a possibility to develop a bundle algorithm that can be implemented in a GIS to interpolate soil profile data from existing datasets. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 93
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Applied regression analysis, DOI 10.1002/9781118625590
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1980, SOIL GENESIS CLASSIF
  • [3] [Anonymous], P 5 INT S SPAT ACC A
  • [4] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST
  • [6] BIRKELAND W, 1999, SOILS GEOMORPHOLOGY
  • [7] A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps
    Bishop, TFA
    McBratney, AB
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2001, 103 (1-2) : 149 - 160
  • [8] Bogunovic M., 1998, Agric. Conspec. Sci, V63, P105
  • [9] Using multiple external drifts to estimate a soil variable
    Bourennane, H
    King, D
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2003, 114 (1-2) : 1 - 18
  • [10] Comparison of kriging with external drift and simple linear regression for predicting soil horizon thickness with different sample densities
    Bourennane, H
    King, D
    Couturier, A
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2000, 97 (3-4) : 255 - 271