Post-harvest food losses in a maize-based farming system of semi-arid savannah area of Tanzania

被引:182
作者
Abass, Adebayo B. [1 ]
Ndunguru, Gabriel [1 ]
Mamiro, Peter [2 ]
Alenkhe, Bamidele [3 ]
Mlingi, Nicholas [1 ]
Bekunda, Mateete [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hub Eastern Africa, IITA, Light Ind Area, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[2] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Morogoro, Tanzania
[3] IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
关键词
Smallholder farmers; Post-harvest loss; Processing; Storage; Food security; KENYA; BORER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspr.2013.12.004
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
An assessment of post-harvest handling practices and food losses in a maize-based farming system in semi-arid areas of Central and Northern Tanzania was carried out in 2012. Seventeen crops were mostly cultivated by the farmers in the surveyed areas; maize (32%), sunflower (16%) and pigeon peas (12%) were the most cultivated while maize was the most stored. There are at least 7 months between two harvest seasons of each crop; while farmers sold the crops soon after harvest to cater for household expenditure (54%) and school fees (38%), the market prices increased significantly (P <= 0.05) within six months of storage. Most processing activities (winnowing, dehulling, drying, sorting and shelling) were carried out manually, almost entirely by women, but mechanized processing for maize, sunflower, millet, and sorghum were commonly practiced. Quantitative post-harvest losses of economic importance occur in the field (15%); during processing (13-20%), and during storage (15-25%). The main storage pests responsible for the losses are larger grain borers (Prostephanus truncatus), grain weevils (Sitophilus granarius) and, the lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica). Most of the farmers considered changes in weather (40%), field damage (33%), and storage pests (16%) as the three most important factors causing poor crop yields and aggravating food losses. However, survey results suggest that the farmers' poor knowledge and skills on post-harvest management are largely responsible for the food losses. 77% of the surveyed farmers reported inadequate household foods and 41% received food aid during the previous year. Increasing farmers' technical know-how on adaptation of the farming systems to climate variability, and training on post-harvest management could reduce food losses, and improve poverty and household food security. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 57
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Ten years after the arrival in Ghana of Larger Grain Borer: Farmers' responses and adoption of IPM strategies
    Addo, S
    Birkinshaw, LA
    Hodges, RJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2002, 48 (04) : 315 - 325
  • [2] Appert J., 1987, TROPICAL AGR SERIES
  • [3] Factors determining the adoption and impact of a postharvest storage technology
    Bokusheva, Raushan
    Finger, Robert
    Fischler, Martin
    Berlin, Robert
    Marin, Yuri
    Perez, Francisco
    Paiz, Francisco
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2012, 4 (02) : 279 - 293
  • [4] Bourne M.C., 1977, Post-harvest food losses: the neglected dimension in increasing the World food supply
  • [5] Calverley D.J.B., 1996, PFLINS001 FAO
  • [6] A model for evaluating interventions designed to reduce post-harvest fish losses
    Cheke, RA
    Ward, AR
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) : 219 - 227
  • [7] Effectiveness of hermetic systems in controlling maize storage pests in Kenya
    De Groote, Hugo
    Kimenju, Simon C.
    Likhayo, Paddy
    Kanampiu, Fred
    Tefera, Tadele
    Hellin, Jon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2013, 53 : 27 - 36
  • [8] Dick K., 1988, BULLETIN, V18
  • [9] Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), 2006, FRAM AFR AGR PROD CA
  • [10] Golob P., 2002, Crop Post-Harvest: Science and Technology, Volume 1: Principles and Practice