Management and outcome of cervical cancer diagnosed in pregnancy

被引:33
作者
Bigelow, Catherine A. [1 ]
Horowitz, Neil S. [2 ]
Goodman, Annekathryn [3 ]
Growdon, Whitfield B. [3 ]
Del Carmen, Marcela [3 ]
Kaimal, Anjali J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Vincent Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Vincent Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
cancer in pregnancy; cervical cancer; gravid hysterectomy; oncology in pregnancy; radical hysterectomy; LATE-PRETERM INFANTS; OF-THE-LITERATURE; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; VAGINAL DELIVERY; EPISIOTOMY SITE; RADICAL SURGERY; STAGE; POSTPARTUM; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.034
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. Approximately 1-3% of cervical cancers will be diagnosed in pregnant and peripartum women; optimal management in the setting of pregnancy is not always clear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the management of patients with cervical cancer diagnosed in pregnancy and compare their outcomes to nonpregnant women with similar baseline characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in pregnancy and matched them 1: 2 with contemporaneous nonpregnant women of the same age diagnosed with cervical cancer of the same stage. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and the Dana-Farber/Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Registry. Data were analyzed using Stata, Version 10.1 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: In all, 28 women diagnosed with cervical cancer during pregnancy were identified from 1997 through 2013. The majority were Stage IB1. In all, 25% (7/28) of women terminated the pregnancy; these women were more likely to be diagnosed earlier in pregnancy (10.9 vs 19.7 weeks, P = .006). For those who did not terminate, mean gestational age at delivery was 36.1 weeks. Pregnancy complications were uncommon. Complication rates in pregnant women undergoing radical hysterectomy were similar to those outside of pregnancy. Time to treatment was significantly longer for pregnant women compared to nonpregnant patients (20.8 vs 7.9 weeks, P = .0014) but there was no survival difference between groups (89.3% vs 95.2%, P = .08). Women who underwent gravid radical hysterectomy had significantly higher estimated blood loss than those who had a radical hysterectomy in the postpartum period (2033 vs 425 mL, P = .0064), but operative characteristics were otherwise similar. None of the pregnant women who died delayed treatment due to pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Gestational age at diagnosis is an important determinant of management of cervical cancer in pregnancy, underscoring the need for expeditious workup of abnormal cervical cytology. Of women who choose to continue the pregnancy, most delivered in the late preterm period without significant obstetric complications. For women undergoing radical hysterectomy in the peripartum period, complication rates are similar to nonpregnant women undergoing this procedure. Women who died were more likely to have advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis. This information may be useful in counseling women facing the diagnosis of cervical cancer in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Advanced stage of cervical carcinoma undiagnosed during antenatal period in term pregnancy and concomitant metastasis on episiotomy scar during delivery: a case report and review of the literature
    Baloglu, A.
    Uysal, D.
    Aslan, N.
    Yigit, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2007, 17 (05) : 1155 - U6
  • [2] CLIBY WA, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P179
  • [3] Improved birth weight table for neonates developed from gestations dated by early ultrasonography
    Doubilet, PM
    Benson, CB
    Nadel, AS
    Ringer, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1997, 16 (04) : 241 - 249
  • [4] Late-preterm infants: A population at risk
    Engle, William A.
    Tomashek, Kay M.
    Wallman, Carol
    Stark, Ann R.
    Adamkin, David H.
    Batton, Daniel G.
    Bell, Edward F.
    Bhutani, Vinod K.
    Denson, Susan E.
    Martin, Gilbert I.
    Watterberg, Kristi L.
    Barrington, Keith J.
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    Raju, Tonse N. K.
    Couto, Jim
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (06) : 1390 - 1401
  • [5] Frega A, 2007, ANTICANCER RES, V27, P2743
  • [6] Management and clinical outcomes of pregnant patients with invasive cervical cancer
    Germann, N
    Haie-Meder, C
    Morice, P
    Lhomme, C
    Duvillard, P
    Hacene, K
    Gerbaulet, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (03) : 397 - 402
  • [7] Late recurrence of squamous cell cervical cancer in an episiotomy site after vaginal delivery
    Goldman, NA
    Goldberg, GL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (05) : 1127 - 1129
  • [8] FETAL AND MATERNAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF STAGE-I-B CERVICAL-CANCER DURING PREGNANCY
    GREER, BE
    EASTERLING, TR
    MCLENNAN, DA
    BENEDETTI, TJ
    CAIN, JM
    FIGGE, DC
    TAMIMI, HK
    JACKSON, JC
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 34 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [9] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381
  • [10] HOPKINS MP, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P9