Liquefaction Evaluation Based on Shear Wave Velocity Using Random Forest

被引:5
作者
Liu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Shushan [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Xiaofei [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Hongmei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhihua [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zhifu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Urban Underground Space Res Ctr, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
关键词
CONE PENETRATION TEST; RESISTANCE; SOILS;
D O I
10.1155/2021/3230343
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Liquefaction evaluation on the sands induced by earthquake is of significance for engineers in seismic design. In this study, the random forest (RF) method is introduced and adopted to evaluate the seismic liquefaction potential of soils based on the shear wave velocity. The RF model was developed using the Andrus database as a training dataset comprising 225 sets of liquefaction performance and shear wave velocity measurements. Five training parameters are selected for RF model including seismic magnitude (M-w), peak horizontal ground surface acceleration (a(max)), stress-corrected shear wave velocity of soil (V-s1), sandy-layer buried depth (d(s)), and a new introduced parameter, stress ratio (k). In addition, the optimal hyperparameters for the random forest model are determined based on the minimum error rate for the out-of-bag dataset (ERROOB) such as the number of classification trees, maximum depth of trees, and maximum number of features. The established random forest model was validated using the Kayen database as testing dataset and compared with the Chinese code and the Andrus methods. The results indicated that the random forest method established based on the training dataset was credible. The random forest method gave a success rate for liquefied sites and even a total success rate for all cases higher than 80%, which is completely acceptable. By contrast, the Chinese code method and the Andrus methods gave a high success rate for liquefaction but very low for nonliquefaction which led to the increase of engineering cost. The developed RF model can provide references for engineers to evaluate liquefaction potential.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GB 50021-2009
[3]   A Novel Hybrid Soft Computing Model Using Random Forest and Particle Swarm Optimization for Estimation of Undrained Shear Strength of Soil [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Qi, Chongchong ;
Lanh Si Ho ;
Trung Nguyen-Thoi ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Manh Duc Nguyen ;
Huu Duy Nguyen ;
Hai-Bang Ly ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Prakash, Indra .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06) :1-16
[4]   CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure [J].
Boulanger, Ross W. ;
Idriss, I. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (02)
[5]  
Breiman L., 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5
[6]   A Binary Packing Material-Based Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Triggering during Earthquakes [J].
Chen, Guoxing ;
Wu, Qi ;
Zhao, Kai ;
Shen, Zhifu ;
Yang, Jun .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (06)
[7]   Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil deposits using artificial neural networks [J].
Hanna, Adel M. ;
Ural, Derin ;
Saygili, Gokhan .
ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2007, 24 (1-2) :5-16
[8]   Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes [J].
Idriss, IM ;
Boulanger, RW .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (2-4) :115-130
[9]   An Analytical Approach to Probabilistic Modeling of Liquefaction Based on Shear Wave Velocity [J].
Johari, A. ;
Khodaparast, A. R. ;
Javadi, A. A. .
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 43 (Suppl 1) :263-275
[10]  
Johari A, 2014, SCI IRAN, V21, P1549