Response of Escherichia coli growth rate to osmotic shock

被引:131
|
作者
Rojas, Enrique [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Theriot, Julie A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Huang, Kerwyn Casey [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biochem, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bacterial morphogenesis; cell mechanics; WALL SYNTHESIS MACHINERY; CHARA-CORALLINA; CELL-SHAPE; IN-VIVO; TURGOR; PLASMOLYSIS; WATER;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1402591111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It has long been proposed that turgor pressure plays an essential role during bacterial growth by driving mechanical expansion of the cell wall. This hypothesis is based on analogy to plant cells, for which this mechanism has been established, and on experiments in which the growth rate of bacterial cultures was observed to decrease as the osmolarity of the growth medium was increased. To distinguish the effect of turgor pressure from pressure-independent effects that osmolarity might have on cell growth, we monitored the elongation of single Escherichia coli cells while rapidly changing the osmolarity of their media. By plasmolyzing cells, we found that cell-wall elastic strain did not scale with growth rate, suggesting that pressure does not drive cell-wall expansion. Furthermore, in response to hyper-and hypoosmotic shock, E. coli cells resumed their preshock growth rate and relaxed to their steady-state rate after several minutes, demonstrating that osmolarity modulates growth rate slowly, independently of pressure. Oscillatory hyperosmotic shock revealed that although plasmolysis slowed cell elongation, the cells nevertheless " stored" growth such that once turgor was reestablished the cells elongated to the length that they would have attained had they never been plasmolyzed. Finally, MreB dynamics were unaffected by osmotic shock. These results reveal the simple nature of E. coli cell-wall expansion: that the rate of expansion is determined by the rate of peptidoglycan insertion and insertion is not directly dependent on turgor pressure, but that pressure does play a basic role whereby it enables full extension of recently inserted peptidoglycan.
引用
收藏
页码:7807 / 7812
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The response of bacterial growth rate to osmotic shock.
    Rojas, E.
    Theriot, J. A.
    Huang, K.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2014, 25
  • [2] Characterization of Escherichia coli nucleoids released by osmotic shock
    Wegner, Anna S.
    Alexeeva, Svetlana
    Odijk, Theo
    Woldringh, Conrad L.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 178 (03) : 260 - 269
  • [3] ON NATURE OF CHANGES INDUCED IN ESCHERICHIA COLI BY OSMOTIC SHOCK
    ANRAKU, Y
    HEPPEL, LA
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1967, 242 (10) : 2561 - +
  • [4] EFFECT OF GROWTH TEMPERATURE ON COLD OSMOTIC SHOCK IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI ML30
    PATCHING, JW
    ROSE, AH
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1971, 69 (DEC): : 429 - &
  • [5] EFFECT OF OSMOTIC SHOCK ON VITAMIN TRANSPORT IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI
    GRIFFITH, TW
    LEACH, FR
    ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 1973, 159 (02) : 658 - 663
  • [6] PORIN ACTIVITY IN OSMOTIC SHOCK FLUID OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI
    BENZ, R
    BOEHLERKOHLER, BA
    DIETERLE, R
    BOOS, W
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1978, 135 (03) : 1080 - 1090
  • [7] Cold shock response in Escherichia coli
    Yamanaka, K
    COLD SHOCK RESPONSE AND ADAPTATION, 2000, : 5 - 26
  • [8] The heat shock response of Escherichia coli
    Arsène, F
    Tomoyasu, T
    Bukau, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (1-3) : 3 - 9
  • [9] Role of glutathione in the response of Escherichia coli to osmotic stress
    Smirnova, GV
    Krasnykh, TA
    Oktyabrsky, ON
    BIOCHEMISTRY-MOSCOW, 2001, 66 (09) : 973 - 978
  • [10] Role of Glutathione in the Response of Escherichia coli to Osmotic Stress
    G. V. Smirnova
    T. A. Krasnykh
    O. N. Oktyabrsky
    Biochemistry (Moscow), 2001, 66 : 973 - 978