Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education

被引:56
作者
Schlesinger, Lena [1 ]
Jentsch, Armin [1 ]
Kaiser, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Koenig, Johannes [3 ]
Blomeke, Sigrid [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Fac Educ, Math Educ, Von Melle Pk 8, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Oslo, Ctr Educ Measurement CEMO, Oslo, Norway
来源
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION | 2018年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Instructional quality; Subject-specific aspects; High-inference ratings; Standardized classroom observations; Mathematics education; CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; TEACHERS; DESIGN; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructional research in German-speaking countries has conceptualized teaching quality recently according to three generic dimensions, namely, classroom management, student support and cognitive activation. However, as these dimensions are mainly regarded as generic, subject-specific aspects of mathematics instruction, e.g., the mathematical depth of argumentation or the adequacy of concept introductions, are not covered in depth. Therefore, a new instrument for the analysis of instructional quality was developed, which extended this three-dimensional framework by relevant subject-specific aspects of instructional quality. In this paper, the newly developed observational protocol is applied to three videotaped mathematics lessons from the NCTE video library of Harvard University to explore strengths and weaknesses of this instrument, and to examine in more detail how the instrument works in practice. Therefore, we used a mixed-methods design to extend the quantitative observer ratings, which enable high inference, by methods from qualitative content analysis. The results suggest the conclusion that the framework differentiates well between the lessons under a subject-specific perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 490
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, VERSTEHENSELEMENTE S
[2]   Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress [J].
Baumert, Juergen ;
Kunter, Mareike ;
Blum, Werner ;
Brunner, Martin ;
Voss, Thamar ;
Jordan, Alexander ;
Klusmann, Uta ;
Krauss, Stefan ;
Neubrand, Michael ;
Tsai, Yi-Miau .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) :133-180
[3]  
Blazar D, 2017, EDUC ASSESS, V22, P71, DOI 10.1080/10627197.2017.1309274
[4]  
Blum W., 2006, BILDUNGS STANDARDS M
[5]  
Brophy J.E., 2000, TEACHING
[6]  
Bruner J., 1974, Toward a theory of instruction
[7]  
Buchholtz N, 2014, J MATH-DIDAKT, V35, P101, DOI 10.1007/s13138-013-0057-y
[8]   Effect of Observation Mode on Measures of Secondary Mathematics Teaching [J].
Casabianca, Jodi M. ;
McCaffrey, Daniel F. ;
Gitomer, Drew H. ;
Bell, Courtney A. ;
Hamre, Bridget K. ;
Pianta, Robert C. .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 73 (05) :757-783
[9]   Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively [J].
Charalambous, Charalambos Y. ;
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina .
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2018, 50 (03) :355-366
[10]  
Deci Edward L., 1985, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination inhuman behaviour