How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?

被引:94
作者
Voorhoeve, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Dept Philosophy Log & Sci Method, London, England
关键词
PRIORITY; HEADACHES; SCANLON; NUMBERS;
D O I
10.1086/677022
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Many believe that we ought to save a large number from being permanently bedridden rather than save one from death. Many also believe that we ought to save one from death rather than a multitude from a very minor harm, no matter how large this multitude. I argue that a principle I call Aggregate Relevant Claims satisfactorily explains these judgments. I offer a rationale for this principle and defend it against objections.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 87
页数:24
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Adler Matthew, 2011, WELL BEING AND FAIR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Utilitarianism and Beyond
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE REJECTION OF CON
[4]  
Brink David., 1993, VALUE WELFARE MORALI, P252
[5]  
Broome John, 2004, GOODNESS AND FAIRNES, P56
[6]  
Broome John, 1991, WEIGHING GOODS
[7]   Priority or sufficiency ... Or both? [J].
Brown, C .
ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2005, 21 (02) :199-220
[8]  
Cowell Frank., 2010, STICERD Working Paper PEP-5, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines
[9]   Equality, priority, and compassion [J].
Crisp, R .
ETHICS, 2003, 113 (04) :745-763
[10]   Headaches, Lives and Value [J].
Dorsey, Dale .
UTILITAS, 2009, 21 (01) :36-58