Relevance and utility of European Union research, technological development and innovation policies for a smart growth

被引:18
作者
Capello, Roberta [1 ]
Lenzi, Camilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture Built Environm & Construct Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2016年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
Research; technological development and innovation; relevance; utility; innovation; regional growth; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; STRUCTURAL FUNDS; REGIONAL POLICY; SPILLOVERS; SYSTEMS; PATTERNS; CONVERGENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0263774X15614655
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessment exercises of research, technological development and innovation measures within the cohesion policy framework do not provide up to now consistent results. Our impression is that the lack of consistency depends on the fact that assessment exercises are developed with no reference to the regional context in which research, technological development and innovation funds are spent. The present paper tries to overcome this gap by providing an assessment of the relevance and utility of research, technological development and innovation which takes into consideration alternative regional innovation contexts. Results indicate that research, technological development and innovation funds are in general relevant to increase innovation. However, our findings warn on the utility of research, technological development and innovation initiatives for socio-economic growth in regions lacking internal scientific research and technological activities. Interesting policy suggestions emerge which go in line with what has been conceptualized in the debate about the regional innovation smart specialization strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 72
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy
[3]  
[Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE EC POLICY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, QUESTION RD SPECIALI
[5]   Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases [J].
Asheim, Bjorn T. ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Cooke, Philip .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (07) :893-904
[6]   Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[7]  
Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630
[8]   Evaluation of European Union cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges [J].
Bachtler, J ;
Wren, C .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 40 (02) :143-153
[9]  
Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations
[10]   Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate [J].
Beaudry, Catherine ;
Schiffauerova, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :318-337